Re: [HACKERS] Postgres service stops when I kill client backend on Windows

Hello Dmitry > -Original Message- > From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Dmitry Vasilyev > Sent: Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015 11:52 > To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: [HACKERS] Postgres service stops when I kill client

Re: [HACKERS] Odd query execution behavior with extended protocol

Hello > Npgsql supports sending multiple SQL statements in a single packet via the > extended protocol. This works fine, but when the second query SELECTs a value > modified by the first's UPDATE, I'm getting a result as if the > UPDATE hasn't yet occurred. Looks like the first updating

Re: [HACKERS] unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK

<pete...@gmx.net>; pgsql-hackers > <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Charles Clavadetscher > <clavadetsc...@swisspug.org> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net&

Re: [HACKERS] unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK

com> > Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Charles Clavadetscher > <clavadetsc...@swisspug.org> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK > > * Peter Eisentraut (pete...@gmx.net) wrote: > > I see. But it is a

Re: [HACKERS] unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK

Hello Peter > I'm testing the new row-level security feature. I'm not clear on the > difference between the USING and CHECK clauses in the CREATE POLICY > statement. > > The documentation says: > > """ > A policy grants the ability to SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE rows > which match the

Re: [HACKERS] Attach comments to functions' parameters and return value

Hello Jim > -Original Message- > From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers- > ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Charles Clavadetscher > Sent: Dienstag, 15. September 2015 07:35 > To: Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com>; pgsql-hackers@postgre

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY

Hi Stephen > On 15.09.2015, at 17:13, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > Charles, > > * Charles Clavadetscher (clavadetsc...@swisspug.org) wrote: >> Yes, that helped a lot! In the attachment now a single patch file >> with all changes. > >

[HACKERS] Attach comments to functions' parameters and return value

Hello In PostgreSQL it is possible to attach comments to almost everything. This made it possible for us to integrate the wiki that we use for our technical documentation directly with the database using the MediaWiki [1] extensions ExternalData [2] and MagicNoCache [3]. The result is a

Re: [HACKERS] Attach comments to functions' parameters and return value

Hello Àlvaro On 14/09/2015 20:02, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Jim Nasby wrote: On 9/14/15 8:59 AM, Charles Clavadetscher wrote: To long time PostgreSQL developers this may look straightforward. For the moment I am not even sure if that is correct and if there are other places that would need

Re: [HACKERS] Attach comments to functions' parameters and return value

Hello Jim On 14/09/2015 19:23, Jim Nasby wrote: On 9/14/15 8:59 AM, Charles Clavadetscher wrote: Hello In PostgreSQL it is possible to attach comments to almost everything. This made it possible for us to integrate the wiki that we use for our technical documentation directly

[HACKERS] [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY

this helps. Regards Charles -Original Message- From: pgsql-docs-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-docs-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Charles Clavadetscher Sent: Sonntag, 13. September 2015 07:36 To: pgsql-d...@postgresql.org Subject: [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY Hello Lately I am

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY

Stephen On 13/09/2015 15:26, Charles Clavadetscher wrote: Hello Stephen On 13/09/2015 14:49, Stephen Frost wrote: Charles, Just FYI, on these lists, we'd prefer it if you wouldn't top-post. * Charles Clavadetscher (clavadetsc...@swisspug.org) wrote: Yes, of course. I will take care

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY

hen Frost > Sent: Sonntag, 13. September 2015 14:31 > To: Charles Clavadetscher <clavadetsc...@swisspug.org> > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY > > Charles, > > * Charles Clavadetscher (clavadetsc...@swisspug.org

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY

Hello Stephen On 13/09/2015 14:49, Stephen Frost wrote: Charles, Just FYI, on these lists, we'd prefer it if you wouldn't top-post. * Charles Clavadetscher (clavadetsc...@swisspug.org) wrote: Yes, of course. I will take care of that and send a new patch. Thanks! Who will then git push

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY

Hi Stephen On 13/09/2015 16:56, Stephen Frost wrote: Charles, * Charles Clavadetscher (clavadetsc...@swisspug.org) wrote: I noticed that the position of the parameter "policy_name" in the description list of parameters was not at the (alphabetically) correct position.