Re: [HACKERS] CVS should die (was: Possible make_oidjoins_check ...)

2004-11-05 Thread David Helgason
he cons – having to forbid renames in all but the most necessary cases – it just invites cruft into any project. d. -- David Helgason, Business Development et al., Over the Edge I/S (http://otee.dk) Direct line +45 2620 0663 Main line +45 3264 5049 On 4. nov 2004, at 20:41, Tom Lane wrote: "Mar

Re: [HACKERS] plperl Safe restrictions

2004-10-14 Thread David Helgason
be very low risk - one or two lines. Take care what you open. Perl may be a fairly secure, but the complex implementation means that problematic corner cases are regularly found. d. -- David Helgason, Business Development et al., Over the Edge I/S (http://otee.dk) Direct line +4

Re: [HACKERS] implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()

2004-02-04 Thread David Helgason
On 4. feb 2004, at 20:51, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Neil Conway wrote: David Helgason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I needed these, so I went and implemented them myself. I didn't see any followup to this: do we want to include this in the main tree, contrib/, or not at all? getbit sounds

Re: [HACKERS] Transaction callback

2004-01-31 Thread David Helgason
my tables that I could put into an illegal state (with a deferred foreign key). Later another trigger took that table out of the illegal state if the right action was performed. David Helgason Over the Edge Entertainments ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[HACKERS] implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()

2004-01-22 Thread David Helgason
I needed these, so I went and implemented them myself. I have to admit I'm not so wise on PostgreSQL backend stuff, and so I abstained from editing the fmgrtab.c and postgres.bki. Sorry for that, but it just seemed too complicated. Perhaps there should really be a script to do this? I could ima