Re: [HACKERS] About the performance of startup after dropping many tables

part of code as we suggested? Thank you. Best reguards, 甘嘉栋(Gan Jiadong) E-MAIL: ga...@huawei.com Tel：+86-755-289720578 * This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from

Re: [HACKERS] About the performance of startup after dropping many tables

part of code as we suggested? Thank you. Best reguards, 甘嘉栋(Gan Jiadong) E-MAIL: ga...@huawei.com Tel：+86-755-289720578 * This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from

[HACKERS] About the performance of startup after dropping many tables

to be dropped, and run through the shared buffers once to check where the buffer's relfilenode is going to be dropped! If we can do this, LWLock traffic will be 13000 , we will have much better performance! Does this work? And is there any risk to do so? Thanks! Best reguards, 甘嘉