Re: [HACKERS] Patch for reserved connections for replication users

2013-10-19 Thread Gibheer
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 12:09:57 +0530 Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote: On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:52:57 +0530 Amit Kapila amit.kapil

Re: [HACKERS] Patch for reserved connections for replication users

2013-10-15 Thread Gibheer
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:52:57 +0530 Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote: On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:38:17 +0530 Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero

Re: [HACKERS] Patch for reserved connections for replication users

2013-10-13 Thread Gibheer
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:38:17 +0530 Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote: On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:39:55 +0530 Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote: Robert Haas wrote: On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Andres

Re: [HACKERS] Patch for reserved connections for replication users

2013-10-11 Thread Gibheer
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:00:51 +0530 Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote: On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:55:24 +0530 Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero

Re: [HACKERS] Patch for reserved connections for replication users

2013-10-10 Thread Gibheer
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:55:24 +0530 Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote: On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:39:55 +0530 Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote: Robert Haas wrote: On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Andres

Re: [HACKERS] Patch for reserved connections for replication users

2013-10-09 Thread Gibheer
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:39:55 +0530 Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote: Robert Haas wrote: On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Andres Freund andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com wrote: Hmm. It seems like this match is making MaxConnections no longer mean the maximum number of connections, but

Re: [HACKERS] Patch for reserved connections for replication users

2013-08-04 Thread Gibheer
On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 08:16:15 -0400 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote: here is an update off my patch based on the discussion with Marko Tiikkaja and Andres Freund. Marko and I had the idea of introducing

Re: [HACKERS] Backup throttling

2013-07-31 Thread Gibheer
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 22:50:19 +0200 Antonin Houska antonin.hou...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/31/2013 07:13 AM, Gibheer wrote: Hi, That is a really nice feature. I don't pretend it's my idea, I just coded it. My boss proposed the feature as such :-) I took a first look at your patch

Re: [HACKERS] Patch for reserved connections for replication users

2013-07-30 Thread Gibheer
Hi, here is an update off my patch based on the discussion with Marko Tiikkaja and Andres Freund. Marko and I had the idea of introducing reserved connections based on roles as it would create a way to garantuee specific roles to connect when other roles use up all connections for whatever

Re: [HACKERS] Backup throttling

2013-07-30 Thread Gibheer
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:20:52 +0200 Antonin Houska antonin.hou...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, the purpose of this patch is to limit impact of pg_backup on running server. Feedback is appreciated. // Antonin Houska (Tony) Hi, That is a really nice feature. I took a first look at your patch and

Re: [HACKERS] replication_reserved_connections

2013-07-28 Thread Gibheer
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 02:23:47 +0200 Marko Tiikkaja ma...@joh.to wrote: Hi, Yesterday an interesting scenario was diagnosed on IRC. If you're running a synchronous slave and the connection to the slave is lost momentarily, your backends start naturally waiting for the slave to reconnect.

[HACKERS] Patch for reserved connections for replication users

2013-07-11 Thread Gibheer
Hi, this patch introduces a new configuration flag replication_reserved_connections to reserve connection slots for replication in the same way superuser_reserved_connections works for superusers. This helps in cases where the application opens connections until max_connections is reached. A

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 Cascading replication after slave promotion

2012-09-22 Thread Gibheer
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:50:07 -0700 Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote: Yeah, I think there's more people that agree with this use-case than you seem to think.. That said, I appreciate that it's not a trivial thing to support cleanly. Not trivial, no, but not major either. Really

Re: [HACKERS] LLVM / clang

2010-06-30 Thread Gibheer
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:49:40 -0400, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: For the record, here is a patch that would address these issues. At the moment, I'm waiting to get my hands on the new version 2.7 of clang to see if some of these issues have gone away. Considering that clang