20.12.2012, 11:43, "Bruce Momjian" :
>> 19.12.2012, 21:47, "Tom Lane" :
>>> "Kevin Grittner" writes:
>>>> Groshev Andrey wrote:
>>>> Mismatch of relation names: database "database
20.12.2012, 13:00, "Bruce Momjian" :
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 08:55:16AM +0400, Groshev Andrey wrote:
>
>> No, old database not use table plob..
>> only primary key
>>
>> --
>> -- Name: plob.ВерсияВнешнегоДокумента$Документ; Type: C
I'm initialize data dir with use ru_RU.UTF8, but this databse use CP1251, ie
one byte per character.
19.12.2012, 21:47, "Tom Lane" :
> "Kevin Grittner" writes:
>
>> Groshev Andrey wrote:
>> Mismatch of relation names: database "database&
No, people can confuse writing, but it makes a computer.
Unfortunately, I have not found developer this database, but I understand the
logic was:
plob - primary key (lob ~ BLOB)
rlob - reference key (lob ~ BLOB)
Maybe if I describe the task, this part of the database, the problem is clear.
We need
65369'::pg_catalog.oid);
ALTER TABLE ONLY "lob.ВерсияВнешнегоДокумента$Документ"
ADD CONSTRAINT "plob.ВерсияВнешнегоДокумента$Документ" PRIMARY KEY
("@Файл", "Страница");
20.12.2012, 06:35, "Bruce Momjian" :
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at
>
> Can you post the full definition of the table on this public email list?
> Also, why did the error think this was in the public schema? Any idea?
>
> ---
>
>> 18.12.2012, 19:38, "Bruce Momjian" :
>>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012
later in the log pg_dump, I found the definition of "new rel"
--
-- Name: plob.ВерсияВнешнегоДокумента$Документ; Type: CONSTRAINT; Schema:
public; Owner: postgres; Tablespace:
--
ALTER TABLE ONLY "lob.ВерсияВнешнегоДокумента$Документ"
ADD CONSTRAINT "plob.ВерсияВнешнегоДокумента$Документ" PR
18.12.2012, 05:22, "Bruce Momjian" :
> This is the first pg_upgrade mismatch report we have gotten about 9.1.
> I have asked the reporter for details.
>
> Is what is the full 9.1 version number?
>
> ---
>> # rpm -qa |grep p
