Hi,
My PostgreSQL client checks the PG_DIAG_SEVERITY error field to determine the
error level.
However, I have now learned that this field is localized. This means that a
server configured with --enable-nls might for example return the string ERREUR
instead of ERROR.
So if I want to determine
Hi!
I've looked at the way libpq handles TLS certificates and plaintext fallback,
and I am somewhat surprised.
The default ssmode is prefer. According to the documentation, this will make
libpq use an SSL connection if possible, but will use a plain text connection
as a fallback. The certifica
Would anybody else be interested in a pg_dump library? I've found a thread from
2013 related to the idea, but the discussion came to nothing.
Thread started here:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/71e01949.2e16b.13df4707405.coremail.shuai900...@126.com
My Motivation:
I'm the developer of a
Am 26.11.2014 um 17:46 schrieb Geoff Montee :
> This topic reminds me of a thread from a couple months ago:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/f8268db6-b50f-429f-8289-da8ffa5f2...@tripadvisor.com
>
> It sounds like adding ICU support to core may also allow for adding
> collation versioning
> Is it broken *worse* in 9.4 than it was in previous versions?
No.
Because the indices need to be rebuilt, the only realistic opportunity for
applying this patch to Postgres.app is when releasing a major new version,
since then people need to migrate their data anyway. That's why I wanted to
> Am 26.11.2014 um 11:20 schrieb Dave Page :
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Jakob Egger wrote:
>> Am 26.11.2014 um 11:05 schrieb Dave Page :
>>
>> You may want to bear in mind that postgres.app is on the main PG
>> downloads page on the website. If
Am 26.11.2014 um 11:05 schrieb Dave Page :
> You may want to bear in mind that postgres.app is on the main PG
> downloads page on the website. If you're patching Postgres to add a
> feature like this, it would become a fork and would have to be moved
> out of the "PostgreSQL Core Distribution" sect
> Bear in mind that this might alter the way indexes are built. From the top of
> my head, I just can't remember if this is true or not. I'm probably wrong?
> Magnus? You would have to try.
That's why I want to include it in the first version of 9.4, when people need
to dump & reload their dat
> One of the
> big arguments against bringing it in then (because it worked) was that
> we'd bring in another compile time dependency that's actually larger
> than PostgreSQL itself.
Magnus: I don't see how this is a problem as long as using ICU is *optional*.
On systems with a working strcoll th
o questions:
>>
>> 1) Does anybody else have experience with this patch? Is it safe to release
>> PostgreSQL binaries with this patch applied to the public?
>>
>> 2) Is there a reason why this patch hasn't been merged into core over the
>> years? Since it requires setting a configure switch (--with-icu) it
>> shouldn't break anything?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jakob Egger
>>
>>
th-icu) it shouldn't
break anything?
Best regards,
Jakob Egger
11 matches
Mail list logo
