On Wed, Feb 16 2011, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost writes:
>> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>>> In particular, getting rid of use of OpenSSL would not be sufficient
>>> to satisfy the most rabid GPL partisans that we were in compliance.
>
>> I've never heard anyone argue that position,
"Dann Corbit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Jason Earl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:32 PM
>> To: Dann Corbit
>> Cc: Jason Earl; The Hermit Hacker; PostgreSQL-development
>>
"Dann Corbit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Why couldn't you just release the win32 version of 7.4 when
>> it was finished. If it takes an extra month then that just
>> gives you guys the chance to circulate *two* press releases.
>> The Native Win32 port is likely to make a big enough spl
The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
>
>> Well, I suppose that history has shown that waiting on specific features
>> causes trouble with postgresql development, but I don't see why a
>> release can't be based around waiting for feature x as long
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 03:25:58PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > the current session. This is kind of an ugly wart on the GUC mechanism,
> > but I think not difficult to do with an assign_hook (it just has to
> > refuse non-interactive settings).
>
>
"scott.marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 14 Mar 2003, Jason Earl wrote:
>
> > It's all good Scott. Anyone wanting to use PostgreSQL arrays
> > would undoubtedly open up the corresponding part of the manual
> > that covers array functions.
"scott.marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Þórhallur Hálfdánarson wrote:
>
> > -*- Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ 2003-03-14 17:43 ]:
> > > Do you really think someone looking for a function to break up a string into a
> > > list of strings would ever think of looking up
press releases,
then that's fine and dandy. But if all you want to do is throw rocks
at the people doing the marketing, then that's another story
altogether.
Jason Earl
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Mark kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 04:25, mlw wrote:
>
> >
> > IMHO, if we can come up with a strong, positive statement, it
> > would help MBA trained CIOs and CTOs choose PostgreSQL. To them,
> > it will show a professional minded development group, it will be
>
Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 1 May 2002, David Terrell wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 02:24:30PM -0400, mlw wrote:
> > > Just out of curiosity, does PostgreSQL have a mission statement?
> > >
> > > If so, where could I find it?
> > >
> > > If not, does anyone see a
Actually with version 3.0 of PyGreSQL there is a
DB-API v2.0 compliant wrapper pgdb.py.
--- Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > I need to know how this is different than our
> current python interface,
> > PyGreSQL.
>
> > > PgSQL is a package of two (2) mod
11 matches
Mail list logo
