[HACKERS] Bug in libpq implentation and omission in documentation?

2012-08-08 Thread Jim Vanns
on the number of parameters permitted in PQexecParams(). Could someone either verify or correct me before I submit an official bug report!? Regards, Jim Vanns -- Jim Vanns Systems Programmer Framestore -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your

Re: [HACKERS] Bug in libpq implentation and omission in documentation?

2012-08-08 Thread Jim Vanns
wrote: Hey Jim, 2012/8/8 Jim Vanns james.va...@framestore.com Hello PG hackers. Yesterday I began diagnosing a peculiar bug in some production code that has been happily running for months. I finally got to the bottom of it despite the rather misleading

Re: [HACKERS] Bug in libpq implentation and omission in documentation?

2012-08-08 Thread Jim Vanns
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 14:24 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: On 08.08.2012 12:36, Jim Vanns wrote: Ah ha. Yes, you're correct. It does mention here that an Int16 is used to specify the number of parameter format codes, values etc. I suggest then that the documentation is updated