Re: [HACKERS] Full text Indexing -out of contrib and into main..

2000-11-27 Thread john huttley
> I believe that it is appropriate for contrib/ because it is a good demo > of FTI-like capabilities. But nothing more, yet. For at least a couple > of reasons: > > 1) It generates the "index" as a table, not a PostgreSQL index or > index-like thing. > > 2) It has a hardcoded list of non-indexed

Re: [HACKERS] Full text Indexing -out of contrib and into main..

2000-11-27 Thread john huttley
> > OK, can someone collect suggestions, add the code, and integrate it for > > 7.1? > > too late in cycle ... How about first thing for 7.2 then? While it lies in limbo, its never going to get the attention it deserves. Regards

[HACKERS] Full text Indexing -out of contrib and into main..

2000-11-27 Thread John Huttley
> > Maybe asking 'Why isn't the contrib full-text-indexer not in the main > tree?' would be more productive on that front. Well, yes. Why isn't it? Full text indexing should be just as much a feature as any other key feature in PG. With the advent of unlimited file and record lengths in 7.1, thi

[HACKERS] full text indexing

2000-11-27 Thread John Huttley
Would you please consider bringing the contributed package into the official distribution. I found that trying to compile it with the RedHat RPM based installation was a monumental pain. I gave up. Its useful, people ask about it on the list, so why not? For comparison, checkout what MSSQL 7 c

[HACKERS] Please advise features in 7.1 (SUMMARY)

2000-11-27 Thread John Huttley
Thanks for your help, everyone. This is a summary of replies. 1. Calculated fields in table definitions . eg. Create table test ( A Integer, B integer, the_sum As (A+B), ); This functionality can be achieved through the use of views. Implementing th

Re: [HACKERS] Please advise features in 7.1

2000-11-22 Thread john huttley
- Original Message - From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "John Huttley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, 23 November 2000 19:05 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Please advise features in 7.1 > "John Huttley" <

Re: [HACKERS] Please advise features in 7.1

2000-11-22 Thread john huttley
- Original Message - From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "John Huttley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, 23 November 2000 19:05 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Please advise features in 7.1 > "John Huttley" <

[HACKERS] Please advise features in 7.1

2000-11-22 Thread John Huttley
Hello, I've looked at the resources available through the web page to CVS and other stuff, however I cant find a statement of whats likely to be in 7.1 and what is planned for later. Reason: I want to know if any of these features are scheduled. 1. Calculated fields in table definitions . eg.

Re: [HACKERS] time stops within transaction

2000-10-17 Thread John Huttley
- Original Message - From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Alex Pilosov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, 18 October 2000 16:21 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] time stops within transaction > Wow, that is strange. > > > > I just ran into a strangest thing: within