Re: [HACKERS] "could not open relation 1663/16384/16584: No such file or directory" in a specific combination of transactions with temp tables

On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Do you want to write up a flag-based patch, or shall I? > > I can do that. BTW, I found a easier way of reproducing this (see attached 2pc.sql). It might help with debugging or verifying a fix/reg

[HACKERS] "could not open relation 1663/16384/16584: No such file or directory" in a specific combination of transactions with temp tables

Architecture: Intel Core 2 Duo OS: linux-2.6.20-gentoo-r8 Filesystem: ext3 Postgres v8.2.3 compiled with gcc 4.1.1-r3 RAM - 2GB Shared buffers - 24MB [All other Postgres configuration parameters are default values] Problem description: COPY into temp table fails using a specific combination of cre

[HACKERS] WAL logging of hash indexes

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-10/msg01468.php, "... I very much want to encourage authors of new Resource Managers and it looks like we may be getting at least 3 new RMs that produce WAL records: hash indexes (currently not WAL-logged), bitmap indexes and clustered indexes for