On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 15:57:25 -0400
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, we have no guarantee that the Linux kernel guys won't
change this again. Apparently we don't break userspace is a
somewhat selectively-enforced principle.
It's selectively enforced in that kernel developers
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 09:23:52 +1100
Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
It appears to me that we are seeing large memory machines much more
commonly in data centers - a couple of years ago 256GB RAM was only
seen in supercomputers. Hence machines of this size are moving from
tweaking
During the direct I/O discussion I'd suggested that somebody from the
PostgreSQL community might want to put in an appearance at the LSFMM
summit in March. Here's the CFP. My guess is that a proposal for a
session on avoiding performance regressions for systems like PostgreSQL,
probably crossing
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:44:15 -0800
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
It seems clear that Kernel.org, since 2.6, has been in the business of
pushing major, hackish, changes to the IO stack without testing them or
even thinking too hard about what the side-effects might be. This is
perhaps
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 11:07:04 -0800
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 12/04/2013 07:33 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
Wow, Josh, I'm surprised to hear this from you.
Well, I figured it was too angry to propose for an LWN article. ;-)
So you're going to make us write it for you
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:01:37 -0800
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Perhaps even better: the next filesystem, storage, and memory management
summit is March 24-25.
Link? I can't find anything Googling by that name. I'm pretty sure we
can get at least one person there.
It looks
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:42:04 -0400
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
As for annotating the commit messages, I think something like:
Reporter: Sam Jones
Author: Beverly Smith
Author: Jim Davids
Reviewer: Fred Block
Reviewer: Pauline Andrews
Can I just toss in one little note from
what it can do for you.
jon
Jonathan Corbet / LWN.net / cor...@lwn.net
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:34:20 -0400
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I have some concerns related to the upcoming conversion to git and how
we're going to avoid having things get messy as people start using the
new repository.
Here's a few responses from the point of view of somebody
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:11:41 -0400
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
We have a clear idea of what should be part of the public history
contained in the authoritative repo and what should be history that is
private to the developer/tester/committer. We don't want to pollute the
10 matches
Mail list logo
