to choose from.
(FWIW, I would love to see more effort in keeping bugzilla's current
versions up-to-date wrt to postgresql, and I note that full postgresql
compatibility is part of the next major release [2.18]. But my hopes are
probably not worth the bits required to transmit them)
--
Ka
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 16:14, scott.marlowe wrote:
> It's on Slashdot, but there's only one post there that mentions the use of
> Postgresql.
>
> On 14 Oct 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> > Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position,
> > especially since oracle pr made
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 17:17, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 16:14, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > > > But we should have some default to print some of the query, because
> > > > right now we print none of it. I am not saying it is perfect, but it is
> > > > bette
l miss your lead on the bleeding edge of RPM
development.
--
Karl DeBisschop
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Seems like that stuff should be in CVS somewhere ... if only so someone
> > else can pick up the ball if you get run over by a truck :-(.
>
> My wife appreciates the sentiment :-). As it stands now, better
> documentation distributed in the source RPM w
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> Rachit Siamwalla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Also i never got a response on who actually packages those linux init
> > scripts that appear in the RPM but not on the pgsql cvs tree. (i am also
> > curious on why it is different, and how the RPM is built).
>
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Do we need to start thinking about an RPM mailing list? Seems there is
> lots of traffic.
IIRC, this question was asked about 6 months ago, and the answer was RPM
should be discussed on PostgreSQL-Ports.
On the other hand, it seems in practice most people are unaware
likely that the
assertions above are universally accepted either.
--
Karl DeBisschop
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > Solaris x867.0 2000-04-12, Marc Fournier
> >
> > scrappy, do you still have this machine?
>
> Doing tests on Solaris x86/7 right now, will report as soon as they are
> done ...
>
> > Solaris 2.5.1-2.7 Sparc
On 2001.03.07 22:06 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I think Bruce wants per-backend data, and this approach would seem to
> only
> > get the data for the current backend.
> >
> > Also, I really don't like the proposal to write files to /tmp. If we
> want a
> > perf tool, then we need to have something
>
> I think the standard installed set of headers is sufficient.
I haven't installed the RPM yet. But I dissent unless things have
changed from 7.0 in that respect. I copmile against executor/spi.h,
based on the examples in the docs. Should I be using something else?
(I
examples in the docs. Should I be using something else?
(I'll have to go look at the 7.1 source, but I just wanted to
register at least some comfusion, if not dissent)
--
Karl DeBisschop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Learning Network/Reference http://www.infoplease.com
Netsaint Plugin Developer[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You may want to take a look through http://www.techstreet.com -- I
searched standards for the keyword 'database', and found that many
of the SQL documents were available as PDFs for $18.00 each.
--
Karl DeBisschop[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Learning Network
if it could be done in a way
that's consistent with the project policy, but that consistency is just slightly less
important to me than short-term usability.
--
Karl DeBisschop[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Learning Network Reference http://www.infoplease.com
Netsaint Plugin Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ve to duplicate someone else's work because
policy was more important than usability.
Putting a short-lived utility in contrib seems fine to me, FWIW. I would certainly
prefer that to putting less tested functionality into the release. But I would like it
if this functionality could somehow be
15 matches
Mail list logo
