On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:15:42 -0500, Tom Lane wrote > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Uh, that seems like it adds extra complexity just for this single case. > > Yeah. I've dropped the idea personally -- the suggestion that the table > owner can provide a SECURITY DEFINER procedure to do the TRUNCATE if > he wants to allow others to do it seems to me to cover the problem.
Could someone point me in the direction of documentation on this SECURITY DEFINER feature? Kind Regards, Keith ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
