Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Stark wrote:
imposed no such conditions. If Microsoft wanted to release a
Microsoft Postgresql under a completely proprietary license they
would be free
to do
I have often wondered, in a completely off-topic and unproductive sort
of way, if exactly
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dncode/html/secure10102002.asp
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom, can you clarify why -0 is valid. Is it for _small_ near zero
values that are indeed negative?
Branch Cuts for Complex Elementary Functions, or Much Ado About
Nothing's Sign Bit W. Kahan; ch. 7 in _The State of the Art in
Numerical Analysis_ ed.
I sent this yesterday, but it seems not to have made it to the list...
I have a couple of comments orthogonal to the present discussion.
1) It would be fairly easy to write log records over a network to a
dedicated process on another system. If the other system has an
uninterruptible
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
Right. I'm not certain about the regex syntax defined by SQL99; I used
the syntax that we already have enabled and it looks like we have a
couple of other variants available if we need them. If someone wants to
research the *actual* syntax specified by SQL99 that would
In addition, this seems to be the canonical paper on snapshot
isolation:
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/berenson95critique.html
There is an excellent, more recent paper, Generalized Isolation Level
Definitions (http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/adya00generalized.html).
Justin Clift wrote:
if [ x$foo = x ]; then
This is the safest way. It prevents problems when $foo begins with with a
-
I don't know about your first question, though.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
Doug McNaught wrote:
You can pass open file descriptors across Unix domain sockets on most
systems, which is a possible way to address the problem, but probably
not worth it for the reasons discussed earlier.
I think that it does solve the problem. The only drawback is that it's not
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How hard would it be to pre-fork an extra backend
How are you going to pass the connection socket to an already-forked
child process? AFAIK there's no remotely portable way ...
No idea but it seemed like a
Tom Lane wrote:
This approach would only work as far as saving the fork() call itself,
not the backend setup time. Not sure it's worth the trouble. I doubt
that the fork itself is a huge component of our start time; it's setting
up all the catalog caches and so forth that's expensive.
On
http://anything.ca.org goes to the same IP address. It has nothing to do
with postgres
- Original Message -
From: Serguei Mokhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PostgreSQL Hackers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:57 AM
Subject: [HACKERS] [OT] http://www.postgresql.ca.org
Ian Lance Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dwayne Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, for one I have no idea what cygwin is, or what it does to
your system, or what security vulnerabilities it might add to your
system. It comes with alot of stuff that I may or may not need, but
mlw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
: So a parser that can scan a DTD and make a usable create table (...)
: line would be very helpful. [...]
Hmm, but hierarchically structured documents such as XML don't map
well to a relational model. The former tend to be
log
metadata changes.
I don't have a machine with XFS installed and it will be at least a week
before I could get around to a build. Any volunteers?
Ken Hirsch
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http
Glomsrød [EMAIL PROTECTED] has volunteered to test on
XFS. The easier we make it, the more help we'll get.
Ken Hirsch
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
.
There's also the Shore data manager. While not a complete SQL database,
I've wondered if it could actually be spliced into PostgreSQL, since the
licenses appear compatible.
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/shore/
Ken Hirsch
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP
Okay, you're right. I just updated my Ghostscript to 7.00 (just out) and it
produced very nice PDFs. I can upload them somewhere if you give me an FTP
address.
Ken Hirsch
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Momjian" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Ken Hirsch" [EMAIL P
write the block.
Ken Hirsch
All your database are belong to us.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Bruce Momjian" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could anyone consider fork a syncer process to sync data to disk ?
build a shared sync queue, when a daemon process want to do sync after
write() is called, just put a sync request to the queue. this can
release
process from blocked on writing
The second parameter to "rtrim" is interpreted as a set of characters and
rtrim:
"Returns string with final characters removed after the last character not
in set"
So rtrim("center_out_opto", "_opto") returns
"center_ou"
because "u" is not in the set {o, p, t, _} but all the characters after
mailing list that mlock() was
a good way to insure the write-ahead condition.
Ken Hirsch
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
mailing list that mlock() was
a good way to insure the write-ahead condition.
Ken Hirsch
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
22 matches
Mail list logo
