5 to 3 GB - does that really help
> performance significantly?
>
> regards
>
> Mark
>
>
> On 11/08/16 16:08, Kisung Kim wrote:
>
>> Thank you for your information.
>> Here is the result:
>>
>> After insertions:
>>
>> ycsb=# select
l
and leaf_pages and make more dense leaf pages.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Lukas Fittl wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Kisung Kim wrote:
>>
>> When I used the index bloating estimation script in
>> https://github.com/ioguix/pgsql-bloat-estimation,
>>
workload (only insert),
then is there any chances to improve PG's index behavior.
Thank you very much.
--
Bitnine Global Inc., Kisung Kim, Ph.D
https://sites.google.com/site/kisungresearch/
E-mail : ks...@bitnine.net
Office phone : 070-4800-5890, 408-606-8602
US Mobile phone : 408-805-2192
which I think of not a good solution.
2015-11-24 8:12 GMT+09:00 Chapman Flack :
> Has anyone got the stomach to try such a thing and see what happens?
> I don't have MSVC here.
>
> -Chap
We have the environment to test your ideas.
Can you explain your ideas with more detail?
2015-10-26 11:12 GMT+09:00 Michael Paquier :
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Kisung Kim wrote:
>
>> Because of the internal implementation of MVCC in PG
>> the update of a row is actually a insertion of a new version row.
>> So if the size of a row is huge
rwrite only the updated column,
the performance difference between Oracle and PG in that case may be
significant.
I researched about this issues in mailing list and google.
But I've not found anything related to this issues.
Thank you.
Kisung Kim.
(C)Bitnine, Kisung Kim, Ph.D
https://s
