nterprisedb.com> wrote
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Mahendranath Gurram
<mahendran...@zohocorp.com> wrote:
> I'm implementing the In-Memory index as per your suggestion. So far it's
> good.
Great news.
> As of now, only one thing is unclear for me. Ho
lot.
Best Regards,
-Mahi
Teamwork divides the task and multiplies the success.
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 13:13:28 +0530 Mahendranath Gurram
<mahendran...@zohocorp.com> wrote
Hi Thomas,
I like the whole idea.
In fact, i understood this in your very first response itself.
es the success.
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:02:30 +0530 Thomas Munro
<thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Mahendranath Gurram
<mahendran...@zohocorp.com> wrote:
> Initially i tried to design the same way.
> I mean, i have created a backgro
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for taking time and explaining the things.
Postgres extensions can't rely on backends inheriting the postmaster's
memory map like this (other than the main shared memory areas which
the core code looks after). For one thing, new backends aren't
created with fork() on all
Teamwork divides the task and multiplies the success.
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:47:24 +0530 Dilip Kumar
<dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Mahendranath Gurram
<mahendran...@zohocorp.com> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Any update on th
Hi Thomas,
Any update on this?
Please let me know how can i proceed further.
Thanks & Best Regards,
-Mahi
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 18:47:37 +0530 Mahi Gurram
wrote
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your response and suggestions to change the code.
Now i