Re: [HACKERS] [PoC] Asynchronous execution again (which is not parallel)

2015-12-17 Thread Mart Kelder
Hi Robert and others, First, I currently don't know the postgresql code well enough yet. I still hope my toughts are usefull. Robert Haas wrote: > It is unclear to me how useful this is beyond ForeignScan, Gather, and > Append. MergeAppend's ordering constraint makes it less useful; we > can as

Re: [HACKERS] Removing INNER JOINs

2014-11-30 Thread Mart Kelder
Hi David (and others), David Rowley wrote: > Hi, > > Starting a new thread which continues on from > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/caaphdvoec8ygwoahvsri-84en2k0tnh6gpxp1k59y9juc1w...@mail.gmail.com > > To give a brief summary for any new readers: > > The attached patch allows for INNER J

Re: [HACKERS] proposal: window function - change_number

2014-09-21 Thread Mart Kelder
Hi Pavel (and others), Op zondag 21 september 2014 15:35:46 schreef u: > 2014-09-21 14:30 GMT+02:00 Mart Kelder : > > Hi Pavel (and others), > > > > Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > Hi > > > I tried to solve following task: > > > >

Re: [HACKERS] proposal: window function - change_number

2014-09-21 Thread Mart Kelder
Hi Pavel (and others), Pavel Stehule wrote: > Hi > I tried to solve following task: > > I have a table > > start, reason, km > = > 2014-01-01 08:00:00, private, 10 > 2014-01-01 09:00:00, commerc, 20 > 2014-01-01 10:00:00, commerc, 20 > 2014-01-01 11:00:00, private, 8 > > and I w