Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Not bad... took you 40 lines to answer my question. Let's see if I can
> beat that...
Sure - it'll be 1 line when it's wrapped in a shell script. And then
we'll be even.
> I understand the argument about metadata and all, and largely agree with
> it. But on the other hand I
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Then how do you tell what version a file is if it's outside of a
> checkout?
It's trivial for git to answer that - the file will either be pristine,
and then we can just scan for the matching SHA1, or modified, and we can
scan (taking a weee bit more time) which are the "clos
Tom Lane wrote:
> Um ... why do either of you feel there's an issue there?
>
> We switched over to $PostgreSQL$ a few years ago specifically to avoid
> creating merge problems for downstream repositories. If there are any
> other keyword expansions left in the source text I'd vote to remove
> the
Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
> I'm an unknown here, I know - I've used PostgreSQL for years, but only
> recently started following the development community... And at this
I'm probably unknown here as well. Hi everyone ;-)
> And remember the warning I gave that my conversion is *not* a direct CVS
> impo
Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Cool - I'm new to git, so I really appreciate any help that I can get.
Great - I am a SoC mentor for 2 other projects (git and moodle) so I've
got some time set aside for SoC stuff. You might as well take advantage
of it :-)
>> For the kind of work you'll be doing (writi
Florian G. Pflug wrote:
>> Initially, I'll post it on http://git.catalyst.net.nz/ and I can run a
>> daily import for you - once that's in place you can probably get a repo
>> with your work on http://repo.or.cz/
Ok - you can now clone from http://git.catalyst.net.nz/postgresql.git
viewable from h
Hi Florian,
I am right now running an rsync of the Pg CVS repo to my work machine to
get a git import underway. I'm rather keen on seeing your cool PITR Pg
project go well and I have some git+cvs fu I can apply here (being one
of the git-cvsimport maintainers) ;-)
For the kind of work you'll be d
