At 02:10 PM 10/18/2001 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Matthew Hagerty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anyone know a good *fast* way to test
> > if a socket is still valid?
>
>What exactly are you trying to defend against?
>
>In general, I don't believe that there
heers,
>
>Mark Pritchard
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matthew Hagerty
> > Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2001 10:47 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [HACKERS] PQstatus() detect chan
Greetings,
PostgreSQL 7.1.3, FreeBSD-4.3-RELEASE, gcc 2.95.3
I'm trying to attempt to detect a failed backend connection, but a call to
PQstatus() always returns the state of the backend when the call was
made. For example, take this test code:
PGconn *pgConn;
PGresult *pgRes
At 08:54 PM 9/5/2001 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > And no, "use syslog" doesn't count.
> >
> > Why not?
>
>The standard implementations of syslog lose log entries under heavy
>load, because they rely on a daemon which reads from a named pipe with
>a l
Uh oops! I misread IIRC as (IRC, i.e. Internet Relay Chat or something
similar.) It is too early! ;) I'll dig in the archives.
Thanks,
Matthew
At 12:03 PM 7/8/2001 -0400, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
>At 11:44 PM 7/7/2001 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>Matthew Hagerty <[EMAIL P
At 11:44 PM 7/7/2001 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Matthew Hagerty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So then how would I code for the exception, i.e. the backend goes down
> just
> > before or during my call to PQsendQuery()? If I am non-blocking then I
> can
> > d
At 03:46 PM 7/7/2001 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Matthew Hagerty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If I don't call PQsetnonblocking() will that affect any of the async
> > functions I'm dealing with?
>
>PQsetnonblocking has nothing to do with the
>PQconsumeInput/
At 02:13 PM 7/7/2001 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Matthew Hagerty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Only applications that have used PQsetnonblocking have a need for this."
>
> > Since I use PQsetnonblocking(), I included PQflush().
>
>Hmm. My opinions about the P
truly and greatly thankful!
Now, on with asynchronous query processing! WooHoo! :)
At 12:35 PM 7/7/2001 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Matthew Hagerty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm working with pqlib in asynchronous mode and I have a question about
> > PQgetResu
Greetings,
I'm working with pqlib in asynchronous mode and I have a question about
PQgetResult. I have this situation:
submit a query via PQsendQuery()
flush to the backend with PQflush()
set my read descriptor on the socket and enter a select()
select returns read_ready on the socket, so ca
Greetings,
Sorry about all the posts lately, but things seems to be running *really*
slow on my database. I have two tables, both are identical and one is used
to hold entries older than a certain date, i.e. the history table. I use
this query to move the old records from one to the other.
Greetings,
Sorry about all the posts lately, but things seems to be running *really*
slow on my database. I have two tables, both are identical and one is used
to hold entries older than a certain date, i.e. the history table. I use
this query to move the old records from one to the other.
();
version
-
PostgreSQL 7.0.3 on i386-unknown-freebsdelf3.4, compiled by gcc 2.7.2.3
(1 row)
Thanks,
Matthew
At 07:18 PM 3/8/2001 +, you wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 01:49:42PM -0500, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> >
Greetings,
I have a real simple table with a timestamp field. The timestamp field has
an index on it. But, the index does not seem to be taken into account for
selects that return rows:
pglog=# explain select time_stamp from history_entries where time_stamp <
'03-01-2000';
NOTICE: QUERY PL
Greetings,
I wrote a few simple programs to log Apache access_log entries to pg. If
this is something anyone would be interested in or if there is someplace I
can submit these to, please let me know.
Thanks,
Matthew
---(end of broadcast)---
TI
Greetings,
Well, it seems that the numeric issue I was having has nothing to do with
the precision and scale being set the same, it has to do with the input
data. The precision has to be at least 2 greater than the biggest number
you need to enter, i.e.
equinox=# create table test ( d numeri
Greetings,
I'm not sure if this is a bug, but I thought someone might like to know
about it. If you create a numeric field with the precision and scale set
the same, you can't insert anything into the field... pg-7.0.2 on
FreeBSD-4.0-Rel.
Matthew
equinox=# create table test2 ( d numeric(8
17 matches
Mail list logo
