On 20/08/14 18:17, Tom Lane wrote:
Hm. I think the without_oid test is not showing that anything is broken;
The other tests aren't showing any functional issue either AFAICS.
Thanks a lot Tom! That's very helpful.
I have written more details and some basic SQL tests in the wiki of the
appli
Tom wrote:
> You would have to show us the actual failure diffs to get much useful
comment, but in general increasing the size of tuple headers could
easily lead to
> changes in plan choices
Thank you Tom. So there is some hope! In effect the query plan is
different for the join and the view
Hello,
I am trying to patch the server source to increase the number of columns
above 1600. I'm not planning to commit this but as suggested elsewhere
[1], someone might suggest a configure option based on this.
I came up with a patch which seems to work (see below), but 3 of the 136
tests fai
