Re: [HACKERS] Hadoop backend?

2009-02-24 Thread Paul Sheer
As far as I can tell, the PG storage manager API is at the wrong level of abstraction for pretty much everything. These days, everything we do is atop the Unix filesystem API, and anything that smgr might have been Is there a complete list of filesystem API calls somewhere that I can get

Re: [HACKERS] Hadoop backend?

2009-02-23 Thread Paul Sheer
It would only be possible to have the actual PostgreSQL backends running on a single node anyway, because they use shared memory to This is not problem: Performance is a secondary consideration (at least as far as the problem I was referring to). The primary usefulness is to have the data be a

[HACKERS] Hadoop backend?

2009-02-21 Thread Paul Sheer
Hadoop backend for PostGreSQL A problem that my client has, and one that I come across often, is that a database seems to always be associated with a particular physical machine, a physical machine that has to be upgraded, replaced, or otherwise maintained. Even if the database is