Re: [HACKERS] Stats collection on Windows

2006-04-05 Thread Peter Brant
I'm going to rip out the destroy code and see how it goes. Patch will be forthcoming if things turn out well. Pete Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/05/06 4:49 pm So I'm sort of thinking that the destroy delay has outlived its usefulness. regards, tom lane

[HACKERS] Stats collection on Windows

2006-04-04 Thread Peter Brant
Hi all, I think I've found the cause (or one of the causes) why stats collection is unreliable on Windows and I'm wondering about the best way to go about fixing it. The problem is that process IDs on Windows seem to be assigned without much rhyme or reason and it seems to happen relatively

Re: [HACKERS] fsutil ideas

2006-02-24 Thread Peter Brant
The code in question is written as C extension functions. I think we were thinking it might be something for contrib (although perhaps that would be too much of an official blessing too?) Pete Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/24/06 8:04 am Isn't this something that could be accomplished