Re: [HACKERS] Pg_stop_backup process does not run - Backup Intervals

2016-05-05 Thread Rodrigo Cavalcante
Hi, Thanks for the feedback. Log: LOG: connection authorized: user=postgres database=template1 LOG: statement: select pg_start_backup('bkpfull',true); ERROR: a backup is already in progress HINT: Run pg_stop_backup() and try again. STATEMENT: select pg_start_backup('bkpfull',true); LOG: di

Re: [HACKERS] Pg_stop_backup process does not run - Backup Intervals

2016-05-03 Thread Rodrigo Cavalcante
Hello Robert, Thanks for the feedback. The my script works, but after a few days it stops working because the process does not end pg_stop_backup. The pg_basebackup already does this substitution? -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Pg-stop-backup-process-does-not-r

[HACKERS] Pg_stop_backup process does not run - Backup Intervals

2016-05-02 Thread Rodrigo Cavalcante
Hi, On alternate days my backup is failing, by the pg_stop_backup process () does not perform or quit. Version PostgreSQL: 9.1.6 The following backup script: PGDATA=/dados SAVE_BASE_DIR=/backup/diario backup="'bkpfull'" data=$(date +'%d%m%y') WAL_DIR=/backup/archive mv $WAL_DIR/* $WAL_DIR/wal

Re: [HACKERS] Issue on C function that reads int2[] (using "int2vector")

2015-12-01 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
2015-11-30 0:39 GMT-02:00 Tom Lane: > Rodrigo Hjort writes: > > I created a custom C function with this signature: > > > CREATE FUNCTION calculate_hash(numbers int2[]) > > RETURNS int8 > > AS 'MODULE_PATHNAME', 'pg_calculate_hash' > >

[HACKERS] Help on creating C function that reads int2[] (using "int2vector")

2015-12-01 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
The whole project is on GitHub: https://github.com/hjort/mega-sena/tree/master/src Best regards, -- Rodrigo Hjort www.hjort.co

[HACKERS] Issue on C function that reads int2[] (using "int2vector")

2015-11-29 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
The whole project is on GitHub: https://github.com/hjort/mega-sena/tree/master/src Best regards, -- Rodrigo Hjort www.hjort.co

Re: [HACKERS] enabling nestedloop and disabling hashjon

2015-02-12 Thread Rodrigo Gonzalez
#x27; comment marker in the file's entry. Or you changed the wrong postgresql.conf file Regards Rodrigo Gonzalez -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2014-12, let's begin!

2014-12-15 Thread Rodrigo Gonzalez
than today cause of my lack of source code.. Best regards Rodrigo Gonzalez -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Disabling ALTER SYSTEM SET WAS: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters

2013-08-05 Thread Rodrigo Gonzalez
...we should smart enough to use the power we receive...if we are not smart...we should start thinking about other profession And excuse my English, I hope the point is clear... Best regards Rodrigo Gonzalez -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make change

Re: [HACKERS] Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll

2013-06-26 Thread Rodrigo Gonzalez
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:13:32 -0400 Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:12:00PM -0300, Rodrigo Gonzalez wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:14:07 -0400 > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:40:17AM +1000, Brendan Jurd wrote:

Re: [HACKERS] Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll

2013-06-26 Thread Rodrigo Gonzalez
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:14:07 -0400 Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:40:17AM +1000, Brendan Jurd wrote: > > On 26 June 2013 03:17, Josh Berkus wrote: > > > How should reviewers get credited in the release notes? > > > > > > a) not at all > > > b) in a single block titled "Reviewe

Re: [HACKERS] Bad error message on valuntil

2013-06-07 Thread Rodrigo Gonzalez
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:07:21 -0700 "Joshua D. Drake" wrote: > > On 06/07/2013 12:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > "Joshua D. Drake" writes: > >> On 06/07/2013 11:57 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >>> I think it's intentional that we don't tell the *client* that > >>> level of detail. > > > >> Why? That seems

Re: [HACKERS] Query not using index for user defined type

2013-04-15 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Rodrigo Barboza writes: > > I created a implic cast for mytype to bigint. > > So when I do the same query it does seq scan, because the column is > > transformed into bigint. > > Yeah. One reason why there's not

Re: [HACKERS] Query not using index for user defined type

2013-04-15 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Rodrigo Barboza writes: > > I created a type 'mytype' (an unsigned int) and created an operator class > > for index. > > Then I created a table with a column of my type and isnerted 1000 > entries. > >

[HACKERS] Query not using index for user defined type

2013-04-15 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
Hi guys. I created a type 'mytype' (an unsigned int) and created an operator class for index. Then I created a table with a column of my type and isnerted 1000 entries. But no matter how many entries I have in the table, it never uses the index. It always does a seq scan. Here is the explain analy

Re: [HACKERS] Unrecognized type error (postgres 9.1.4)

2013-04-09 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 6:19 PM Rodrigo Barboza wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Amit Kapila > wrote: > On Monday, April 08, 2013 7:28 PM Rodrigo Barboza wrote: > >> You have identified rightly in your ot

Re: [HACKERS] Unrecognized type error (postgres 9.1.4)

2013-04-09 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Monday, April 08, 2013 7:28 PM Rodrigo Barboza wrote: > On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Rodrigo Barboza > wrote: > Ok! I will try to reproduce in a smaller scenario. > On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Amit Kapila > wr

Re: [HACKERS] Unrecognized type error (postgres 9.1.4)

2013-04-08 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Rodrigo Barboza wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Rodrigo Barboza > wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Rodrigo Barboza > > wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>

Re: [HACKERS] Unrecognized type error (postgres 9.1.4)

2013-04-08 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Rodrigo Barboza wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Rodrigo Barboza > wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Rodrigo Barboza > > wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> O

Re: [HACKERS] Unrecognized type error (postgres 9.1.4)

2013-04-08 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Rodrigo Barboza wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Rodrigo Barboza > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> >>> Rodrigo Barboza writes: >>> > UPDATE

Re: [HACKERS] Unrecognized type error (postgres 9.1.4)

2013-04-08 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Rodrigo Barboza wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Rodrigo Barboza writes: >> > UPDATE tm32 SET a = a + 1 WHERE a > $i; >> > ERROR: unsupported type: 202886 >> >> I'm be

Re: [HACKERS] Unrecognized type error (postgres 9.1.4)

2013-04-08 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Rodrigo Barboza writes: > > UPDATE tm32 SET a = a + 1 WHERE a > $i; > > ERROR: unsupported type: 202886 > > I'm betting that's coming from scalargtsel, which doesn't know anything > about your type, but

Re: [HACKERS] Unrecognized type error (postgres 9.1.4)

2013-04-06 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
Ok! I will try to reproduce in a smaller scenario. On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Saturday, April 06, 2013 12:18 PM Rodrigo Barboza wrote: > >On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Amit Kapila > wrote: > >> On Saturday, April 06, 2013 3:57 AM

Re: [HACKERS] Unrecognized type error (postgres 9.1.4)

2013-04-05 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Saturday, April 06, 2013 3:57 AM Rodrigo Barboza wrote: > > >Hello. > > I created a type my_uint that is a unsigned int 32. > > > I am trying to update data of a table that contains a column of this &g

[HACKERS] Unrecognized type error (postgres 9.1.4)

2013-04-05 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
Hello. I created a type my_uint that is a unsigned int 32. I am trying to update data of a table that contains a column of this type. Here is what happens: postgresql=> explain analyze UPDATE attribute_type_conf SET rowform = rowform +1 where rowform <= 18; ERROR: unsupported type: 132852 postg

Re: [HACKERS] Why there is a PG_GETARG_UINT32 and PG_RETURN_UINT32?

2013-04-04 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
ssing something On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Thursday, April 04, 2013 8:30 PM Rodrigo Barboza wrote: > > > Hi guys. > > I am wondering when I can use the PG_GETARG_UINT32 and PG_RETURN_UINT32. > > If postgres has no unsigned int type, what i

[HACKERS] Why there is a PG_GETARG_UINT32 and PG_RETURN_UINT32?

2013-04-04 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
Hi guys. I am wondering when I can use the PG_GETARG_UINT32 and PG_RETURN_UINT32. If postgres has no unsigned int type, what is the use of these macros?

Re: [HACKERS] c language functions

2013-04-03 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
I see, that's true. I'm returning unknown type, there is a little more overhead. But it's working now. =] Thanks for the help guys! On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Rodrigo Barboza > wrote: > > Well, I was chec

Re: [HACKERS] c language functions

2013-04-03 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
Well, I was checking inside my function the type of the second argument and switching between the allowed types. This way kind of does the same thing of many functions, doesn't it? On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Rodrigo Barboza writes: > > Why not useful?

Re: [HACKERS] c language functions

2013-04-03 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
Why not useful? If I don't make it receive anyelement, I will have to create an add function for each type. Correct me if I'm wrong. On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Rodrigo Barboza > wrote: > > Hello. > > I'

[HACKERS] c language functions

2013-04-03 Thread Rodrigo Barboza
Hello. I'm trying to create a generic add function. I have defined a type my_uint and it needs a '+' operator. This operator should work like normal int + int operation. The function is defined expecting arguments (my_uint, anyelement). I'm confused in retrieving the anyelement type, value and tha

Re: [HACKERS] Strange behavior on to_tsquery()

2011-11-04 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
//git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=e3e3087d8717c26cd1c4581ba29274ac214eb816 > >regards, tom lane > I modified my code by calling *palloc0()* instead and that issue no longer appears. :D Thanks, Tom Lane! -- Rodrigo Hjort www.hjort.co

[HACKERS] Strange behavior on to_tsquery()

2011-11-03 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
the same. 1) Do you have any clue on what could be happening and how to solve this issue, please? 2) Sometimes the value returned by *to_tsquery()* has a ":*" suffix. What does that mean? Thanks in advance. Best Regards, -- Rodrigo Hjort www.hjort.co

Re: [HACKERS] What Would You Like To Do?

2011-09-13 Thread Rodrigo Gonzalez
On 09/13/2011 04:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Rodrigo Gonzalez writes: In a perfect world, it would be nice if one could do combined queries linking a PostgreSQL database with an Oracle one, or a MySQL one, Can't you do that with FDW that is present in 9.1? FDW provides the structure within

Re: [HACKERS] What Would You Like To Do?

2011-09-13 Thread Rodrigo Gonzalez
On 09/13/2011 03:51 PM, Michael Nolan wrote: For example: A fully integrated ability to query across multiple databases,possibly on multiple servers, something Oracle has had for nearly two decades. That isn't the approach to take. The fact that Oracle has

Re: [HACKERS] WAL dump tool

2009-05-17 Thread Rodrigo E . De León Plicet
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Robert Treat wrote: > On Saturday 09 May 2009 00:20:43 Jaime Casanova wrote: >> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:43 AM, higepon wrote: >> > Hi. >> > Is the following todo item still necessary? >> > >> >  Create dump tool for write-ahead logs for use in determining >> > t

Re: [HACKERS] NULL OR ZERO

2008-02-06 Thread Rodrigo E. De León Plicet
On Feb 3, 2008 7:41 PM, Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 3, 2008 7:26 PM, Omar Bettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Probably I am on the wrong place but for me NULL on numbers means 0 or ZERO. > > I know about standards... > > > > NULL means unknown value, ZERO is a known value

[HACKERS] DBLink's default user: postgres

2007-10-17 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
()') rot-> AS (usr name, db name); usr| db --+ postgres | escola (1 registro) This way, I fear DBLink functions should become a vulnerability issue on my database. Is there any way to protect or override this setting? Or it should be done on pg_hba.conf only

[HACKERS] Deferred Constraints

2007-08-16 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
Dear Hackers, Could you point me the first version PostgreSQL started to support Deferred Constraints (ie: DEFERRABLE keyword on foreign keys creation)? I guess it is earlier than 7.0, right? -- Regards, Rodrigo Hjort http://icewall.org/~hjort ---(end of broadcast

Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: index row size

2007-06-04 Thread Rodrigo Sakai
>but I'll bet >a nickel your CREATE TYPE says something else --- probably varlena You win, how can I pay this bet? :) Very very thanks, I was looking for the error in the wrong place! It was so simple and works! But still have another problem, may be related with my output functions!?!?

Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: index row size

2007-06-03 Thread Rodrigo Sakai
>Indeed ... *please* tell us your compiler issued a warning about that. I did shell scripts that suppress the warnings, so it was a big mistake, I agree! But I think my problem is not here! > Well, you oughta allocate result before you store into it, not after, > and I bet you meant to assign to

Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: index row size

2007-06-03 Thread Rodrigo Sakai
tvi_char). Just date types are allowed! Any other suggestions?? Thanks! -Original Message- From: Jeremy Drake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: segunda-feira, 4 de junho de 2007 00:23 To: Rodrigo Sakai Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: index row size Just glancing at

[HACKERS] ERROR: index row size

2007-06-03 Thread Rodrigo Sakai
Hello, Ok, I give up! Tried a lot of things in my code! But still get error on index row size. So, I'm part of my code, if someone could help me! A valid value for this type is: '(03-jan-2007 , 15-may-2010)' typedef struct t_periodo { DateADT tvi; DateADT

[HACKERS] ERROR: index row size

2007-06-02 Thread Rodrigo Sakai
Hello, I'm having a big trouble with the index size! I have looked for a solution in the internet, but the solutions that I found don't fit for me! I developed a new data type using C and add this new type on PostgreSQL. Basically, the data type is: (DateADT, DateADT) with some temporal

[HACKERS] ERROR: index row size 2960 exceeds btree maximum

2007-05-30 Thread Rodrigo Sakai
Hello, I'm developing an application that needs a different data type. So, I have implemented this new data type inside postgresql using C, as documentation shows to. Basically, the data type is a composition of two timestamps, like: (timestamp, timestamp) and it is called 'period'. S

[HACKERS] Passing parameters to a C function

2007-05-30 Thread Rodrigo Sakai
Hello, I have a question about passing parameters to a C function. Imagine the example by PostgreSQL: PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(complex_add); Datum complex_add(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { Complex*a = (Complex *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(0); Complex*b = (Complex *) PG_GETARG_P

[HACKERS] Ontology on PostgreSQL - is there something?

2006-11-18 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
know-how on the backend internals, how difficult is it to develop this (3 operators + 1 index type)? -- Best regards, Rodrigo Hjort http://icewall.org/~hjort CELEPAR - Cia de Informática do Paraná - Brasil http://www.pr.gov.br

Re: [HACKERS] session id and global storage

2006-06-29 Thread Rodrigo De Leon
That's pretty roundabout. We already expose (hex coded) pid.starttime as a session identifier in log_line_prefix (it's the %c escape) so I don't see any reason not to provide either the same thing directly in a function, or at least to expose the backend pid. That would be nice. ---

Re: [HACKERS] session id and global storage

2006-06-29 Thread Rodrigo De Leon
WHERE datname = current_database() AND usename = session_user AND client_addr = inet_client_addr() AND client_port = inet_client_port(); Regards, Rodrigo ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will i

Re: [HACKERS] Connection Broken with Custom Dicts for TSearch2

2006-06-07 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
How about those "pg_ts*" tables, which are specific for a database? Will they serve to the whole cluster?2006/6/7, Teodor Sigaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >:OpenFTS never, but tsearch2 is possible. But it requires enough work to do, so I    have doubt that it will be done in 8.2...-- R

Re: [HACKERS] Connection Broken with Custom Dicts for TSearch2

2006-06-02 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
Oleg, Actually I got PG 8.1.4 compiled from source on a Debian GNU/Linux 2.6.16-k7-2. My locale is pt_BR, but I configured TSearch2 to use rules from the 'simple'. Then I just followed the instructions from the link. The fact is that it only works at the first time. Regards, Rodrigo

[HACKERS] Connection Broken with Custom Dicts for TSearch2

2006-06-02 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
#x27;hundred':10(1 registro)fuzzy=# select to_tsvector('the quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog 100'); server closed the connection unexpectedly    This probably means the server terminated abnormally    before or while processing the request.A conexão com servidor foi perdida. Tentando reiniciar: Falhou. !> \qRegards,Rodrigo Hjorthttp://icewall.org/~hjort

Re: [HACKERS] LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes

2006-05-25 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
* from table where field like 'THE NAME%'; -- index scanselect * from table where field like '%THE NAME%'; -- seq scanselect * from table where field like :bind_param; -- seq scan (always)Regards, Rodrigo Hjort http://icewall.org/~hjort

Re: [HACKERS] LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes

2006-05-25 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
%' on static text or bound paremeter, makes the planner always do a sequential scan. Is that the scenario?-- Rodrigo Hjorthttp://icewall.org/~hjort 2006/5/23, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: "Rodrigo Hjort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> What happens is that only the "004

[HACKERS] LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes

2006-05-23 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
t;);   ps = con.prepareStatement(sql2);   inicio = System.currentTimeMillis ();   rs = ps.executeQuery();   rs.next();   qtd = rs.getLong(1);   rs.close();   tempo[3] = System.currentTimeMillis() - inicio;   ps.close();        co

Re: [HACKERS] Issue on Varchar Ordering

2006-03-29 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
Thanks all. I'm gonna try other locales and encodings.2006/3/29, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: "Rodrigo Hjort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> The fact is that I can't raise PostgreSQL with C encoding, as special> characters are used on most tables. You're c

Re: [HACKERS] Issue on Varchar Ordering

2006-03-29 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
- 36 | GABRIELA HELEDA DE SOUZA 37 | GABRIELA JACOBY NOS 38 | GABRIEL ALCIDES KLIM PERONDI 39 | GABRIELA LETICIA BATISTA NUNES 40 | GABRIEL ALEXANDRE DA SILVA MANICA(5 rows)--Jonah H. Harris, Database Internals ArchitectEnterpriseDB Corporation 732.331.1324-- Regards,Rodrigo HjortGTI - Projeto PostgreSQLCELEPAR - Cia de Informática do Paranáhttp://www.pr.gov.br

[HACKERS] Issue on Varchar Ordering

2006-03-29 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
Pg-Hackers,I'm having the following issue:create table aluno (id serial, nome varchar(60));rodrigo=# select * from aluno order by nome offset 35 limit 5; id |   nome+---  36 | GABRIELA HELEDA DE SOUZA 37 | GABRIELA JACOBY NOS 38 | GABRIEL AL

Re: [HACKERS] Restoring a Full Cluster on a Different Architecture (32 x 64)

2006-03-15 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
n't have the uptime requirement it probably doesn't make sense.--Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Pervasive Software   http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf   cell: 512-569-9461 -- Regards,Rodrigo HjortGTI - Projeto PostgreSQLCELEPAR - Cia de Informática do Paranáhttp://www.pr.gov.br

[HACKERS] Restoring a Full Cluster on a Different Architecture (32 x 64)

2006-03-13 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
64-bit integersMaximum length of locale name:    128LC_COLLATE:       pt_BRLC_CTYPE: pt_BR** Regards,Rodrigo HjortGTI - Projeto PostgreSQLCELEPAR - Cia de Informática do Paranáhttp://www.pr.gov.br

[HACKERS] Server Programming in C: palloc() and pfree()

2006-02-09 Thread Rodrigo Hjort
temp);   }// pfree(temp); // doesn't work...}// 3)void delstr(char *str, const int start, const int size){   int i, j;    char* temp = palloc(strlen(str) - size + 1);   for (i = 0; (i < start - 1) && (i < strlen(str)); i++)  temp[i] = str[i];   for (j = start + size - 1; j &l

RES: [HACKERS] Pg_autovacuum on FreeBSD

2005-07-08 Thread Rodrigo Moreno
Hi, Thanks a Lot, it works. So when it was changed (use of postgresql=YES), because I1m still use the old way, download sources from postgres mirros, compile and install. Best Regards Rodrigo -Mensagem original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Christopher

[HACKERS] Pg_autovacuum on FreeBSD

2005-07-07 Thread Rodrigo Moreno
Hi All, The pg_autovacuum on FreeBSD and pg 803 is not working. Just do nothing, no log, nothing in screen, no daemonize. It was ok on pg746. Could some one help me ? Best Regards Rodrigo Moreno ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched

[HACKERS] Fwd: SELECT MAX with char => BUG?

2004-11-20 Thread Rodrigo Carvalhaes
Hi ! I am quite confused of the results on a SELECT max... My environment: Conectiva Linux 10, PostgreSQL 7.4.6 (compiled from the sources) My problem is the "select max(id) FROM test" the result is 20 but the right is 1020. Is this a BUG or I am crazy ?? Cheers, Rodrigo Carvalha

[HACKERS] PostgreSQL as a DDBMS

2004-08-19 Thread Rodrigo Bonfa
and each fragment is located on different places (postgresql servers)? See that the Data Base is Unique, but the Data are distributed throught a horizontal partitioning. How PostgreSQL could help me to solve this problem? Thanks, Rodrigo. ---(end of broadcast

Re: [HACKERS] MS SQL features for new version

2004-02-15 Thread Rodrigo
Shridhar Daithankar wrote: Just stumbled upon this. just an FYI, http://www.microsoft.com/sql/yukon/productinfo/top30features.asp Shridhar From the page: > A new Snapshot Isolation (SI) level will be provided at the > database level. With SI, users will be able to access the > last committed ro