[HACKERS] UNIQUE not unique with inheritance (workaround?)

2003-02-08 Thread Samuel Sieb
Is there any workaround for this problem? I'm getting involved in a project where inheritance is an incredibly useful feature, but the non-unique issue could be a serious stumbling block. Is there any way to work around it with a trigger or something? ---(end of broad

Re: [HACKERS] COPY BINARY is broken...

2000-12-02 Thread Samuel Sieb
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:56:57PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I would rip it out. > > I thought about that too, but was afraid to suggest it ;-) > > How many people are actually using COPY BINARY? > I have used it, I don't think I'm actually using

Re: [HACKERS] How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster

2001-03-06 Thread Samuel Sieb
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 12:46:24PM -0800, Nathan Myers wrote: > > On Linux, /usr/src/linux/include is meaningless for anything in userland; > it's meant only for building the kernel and kernel modules. That Red Hat > tends to expose it to user-level builds is a long-standing bug in Red > Hat'

Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal handler

2001-03-17 Thread Samuel Sieb
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 09:33:03AM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote: > > The general problem remains. We only have one central > collector with a limited receive capacity. The more load is > on the machine, the smaller it's capacity gets. The more > complex the DB schemas get