sed as this purpose.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-03/msg00971.php
regards,
--
Takeshi Yamamuro
NTT Cyber Communications Laboratory Group
Software Innovation Center
(Open Source Software Center)
Tel: +81-3-5860-5057 Fax: +81-3-5463-5490
Mail:yamamuro.take...@lab.ntt.co.jp
--
Sent
So why don't we use LZ4?
+1
Agree though, I think there're still patent issues there.
regards,
--
----
Takeshi Yamamuro
NTT Cyber Communications Laboratory Group
Software Innovation Center
(Open Source Software Center)
Tel: +81-3-5860-5057 Fax: +81-3-5463-5490
Mail:yam
;m misreading it he has about a 2.5
> times speed improvement but about a 20% worse compression result.
>
> What would be interesting would be to see if the knobs he's tweaked
> could be tweaked a bit more to give us substantial speedup without
> significant space degradation.
, the
compression speed overcomes those in gzip and bzip2.
Anyway, the compression speed in lz4 is very fast, so in my
opinion, there is a room to improve the current implementation
in pg_lzcompress.
regards,
--
Takeshi Yamamuro
NTT Cyber Communications Laboratory Group
Software Innovation C