> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC:
> pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] To all the pgsql
> developers..Have a look at the operators proposed by me in my researc> > On
> Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 01:37:19PM +, Tasneem Memon w
entire index) every time you run a query. Have you >
> given any thought to this?>
Yes u are right.. that’s my main concern. Here I have just put forward an idea
to incorporate fuzziness in current database systems through the ANSI SQL; but
still I have to look into that problem if it
> CC: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re:
> [HACKERS] To all the pgsql developers..Have a look at the operators proposed
> by me in my research paper.> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 19:13:54 -0500> To: [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> > On Jun 1, 2
Dear All,
I am explaining here how i have defined the operators NEAR and NOT NEAR in my
research paper. I want critics/comments from all of you on the operators.
These operators belong to the category of “Fuzzy Operators” proposed in the
paper for ANSI SQL.
NEAR
It deals with the NUMBER
Dear Developers,
Hi, I am Tasneem Memon doing MS Computer Science. I am working on my thesis
these days, for which I have defined some operators theoritically as well as
their algorithms, and intend to implement them in PostgreSQL. These
operators(NEAR, NOT NEAR) are binary and work with
