[HACKERS] Static code checker research worth investigating (Communications of the ACM, 03/2016, Vol. 59, No. 03, p. 99)

2016-03-05 Thread Tom Browder
Interesting article in latest issue of subject titled: "A Differential Approach to Undefined Behavior Detection" which may describe procedures not used in other static analysis programs. Article references the authors' website here: http://css.csail.mit.edu/stack which contains more info l

Re: [HACKERS] Static code checker research worth investigating (Communications of the ACM, 03/2016, Vol. 59, No. 03, p. 99)

2016-03-05 Thread Tom Browder
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote: > On Sat, 2016-03-05 at 06:24 -0600, Tom Browder wrote: >> Interesting article in latest issue of subject titled: >> >> "A Differential Approach to Undefined Behavior Detection" ... > AFAIK this is not an enti

[HACKERS] Re: Static code checker research worth investigating (Communications of the ACM, 03/2016, Vol. 59, No. 03, p. 99)

2016-03-05 Thread Tom Browder
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Greg Stark wrote: > On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Greg Stark wrote: >> Well. Not dealt with yet. I think it's more or less clear how to >> tackle it using macros and builtins now but there's a lot of drudgery >> work to actually rewrite all the checks. I have th