ge tables can be totally ignored by pg_autovacuum in my
setup. As you can see from the weird -t and -T parameters I already tried to
make it favor those smaller tables (which get about the same amount of updates
as the large tables), but I'm not quite sure I'm doing it the right way.
Rega
On 2003-04-03 18:40:54 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Vincent van Leeuwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ... This cost us about 10 hours downtime. If I'd had the option I just
> > would've set ZERO_DAMAGED_PAGES to true and let it run for a few days to sort
> > its
t remains
that I actually have a real-life situation where running (for a while at
least) with ZERO_DAMAGED_PAGES on makes some kind of sense.
Vincent van Leeuwen
Media Design - http://www.mediadesign.nl/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
s kind of functionality in PG, I've got a database that
caches data which only gets conditional INSERT/UPDATEs, so that would save a
lot of wasted SQL commands.
Vincent van Leeuwen
Media Design
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can
