Re: [HACKERS] Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct

Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > Karen Hill wrote: > > Gavin Sherry wrote: > >> Recenly, I've been researching and putting together a proposal for window > >> functions. > > > > Implementing NULLS FIRST and NULLS LAST appears like another > > chall

Re: [HACKERS] Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct input

Gavin Sherry wrote: > Recenly, I've been researching and putting together a proposal for window > functions. Implementing NULLS FIRST and NULLS LAST appears like another challenging step to getting window functions wrapped up. Has your research lead you to any ideas on what your strategy for NULL

Re: [HACKERS] Release Notes: Major Changes in 8.2

Simon Riggs wrote: > > SQL:2003 Analytical functions (Sergey, Tom, Neil) > > All statistical aggregate functions defined by SQL:2003 are now > supported and user-defined aggregates now can take multiple columns as > inputs. > Could this be a good starting point for SQL:2003 Window functions

[HACKERS] DTrace?

I skimmed the thread "Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches". Wouldn't Solaris 10's DTrace be helpful in seeing what's going on? It seems DTrace was meant for these types of problems. __ Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sit

[HACKERS] PostgreSQL roadmap for 8.2 and beyond.

Autovacuum is getting put into the 8.1 release which is awesome. A lot of us are wondering now that PostgreSQL has all the features that many of us need, what are the features being planned for future releases? What do you see for 8.2 and beyond? What type of features are you devs planning for 9.