yes, this is a bug in netbsd-current that was introduced with about 5 month
ago with the new unified buffer cache system. it has been fixed.
thanks.
From: Chuck Silvers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CVS commit: syssrc
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 17:37:44 +0300 (EEST)
i will be reinstalling this SS20 with a full installation sometime in
the next few days. i will re-run the testsuite after this to see if
that is causing any of the lossage.
Please let us know.
actually, i had a classic i could test with -- all except horology passed,
so
digging into the regression.diffs, i can see that:
- reltime failed because it just had:
! psql: Backend startup failed
The postmaster log file should have more info, but a first thought is
that you ran up against process or swap-space limitations. The parallel
check
matthew green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
digging into the regression.diffs, i can see that:
- reltime failed because it just had:
! psql: Backend startup failed
The postmaster log file should have more info, but a first thought is
that you ran up against
CREATE INDEX hash_i4_index ON hash_i4_heap USING hash (random int4_ops);
+ ERROR: cannot read block 3 of hash_i4_index: Bad address
"Bad address"? That seems pretty bizarre.
This is obviously something that shows up on _some_ NetBSD platforms.
The above was on
