On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Guillaume Smet wrote:
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 18:58:58 +0100
From: Guillaume Smet guillaume.s...@gmail.com
To: Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Cc: Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net,
PostgreSQL-development pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, o...@pyrenet.fr
Subject: Re: [HACKERS]
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:02:35 -0500
From: Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net
To: o...@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore -m failing
o...@pyrenet.fr wrote:
hi all,
After Andrew
hi all,
After Andrew corrected the bug I found on pg_restore (-C -m misbehaving
one with the other), I played again yesterday.
before the end of restore, I get this :
pg_restore: launching item 4202 INDEX idx_typeper_actif
pg_restore: [custom archiver] could not close archive file: Argument
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:58:18 -0500
From: Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net
To: Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Cc: o...@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore new option -m
Tom Lane wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:05:32 -0500
From: Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
To: o...@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore new option -m
o...@pyrenet.fr writes:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
hi,
i've been testing new -m option of pg_restore with great pleasure.
first, let me thank the developpers, it cut restoring time by half.
is it normal that -m doesn't cope well with -C?
createdb db
pg_restore -m 4 -d db db.dmp
works like a charm while
pg_restore -C -m 4 -d template1 db.dmp
Tom,
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:17:18 -0500
From: Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
To: o...@pyrenet.fr
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com,
Zdenek Kotala zdenek.kot...@sun.com,
pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject:
Dear Tom,
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 13:24:21 -0500
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS]
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:00:31 +0200
From: Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED], Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:15:28 -0500
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:23:06 -0500
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head
Dear all,
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:17:52 +0200
From: Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re:
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:29:01 +0200
From: Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb hangs on unixware
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:19:15 +0200
From: Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb hangs on unixware
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:47:19 +0200
From: Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb hangs on unixware
Hi all,
cvs head configured without --enable-debug hang in initdb while making
check.
warthog doesn't exhibit it because it's configured with debug.
when it hangs, postmaster takes 100% cpu doing nothing. initdb waits for
it while creating template db.
According to truss, the last usefull
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:22:25 +0100
From: Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb hangs on unixware
Could you generate a core and send a
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:22:25 +0100
From: Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cvs head initdb hangs on unixware
Could you generate a core and send a
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Guillaume Smet wrote:
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:23:47 +0200
From: Guillaume Smet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS build takes far longer than before
Hi all,
While working on our
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:37:51 -0400
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] jaguar is failing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As you can see here:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:36:24 -0400
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] jaguar is failing
I wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The only diff is that jaguar is
As you can see here:
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=jaguarbr=HEAD
Jaguar has been failing for two days while centaur is ok.
The only diff is that jaguar is compiling with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS
Is that related?
Thought you should know.
Regards
--
Olivier PRENANT
Hi All,
Is it me or none of the mirror names can be resolved?
ftp.fr.postgresql.org host unknown
ftp.fr4.postgresql.org host unknown
Regards
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:22:13 -0500
From: Jonah H. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] sun to buy mysql
On Jan 19, 2008 10:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm surprised no one mentioned here that Sun was ready to buy Mysql for $1
billion.
Could it change something for postresql? if yes, what?
Best regards,
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190
: Cron Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] cd /home/ohp/build-farm ./run_build.pl
--verbose
[05:00:02] checking out source ...
[05:01:00] checking if build run needed ...
[05:01:04] copying source to pgsql.10004 ...
[05:01:29] running configure ...
[05:01
Hi all,
I'm trying to write a trigger that converts integer to bytea.
My schema is like this:
Create table xx (
id int,
...
data bytea);
the first 3 bytes of data are the binary representation of id
(id is extracted from data by the application)
I can occur that id change in that case
Hi Gregory
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Gregory Stark wrote:
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:34:57 +
From: Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: convert int to bytea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
select 124::bytea
Jaguar is a new animal meant to test specific defines as asked by Tom
sometime ago.
Right now, it compiles and runs with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS
Let me know if you want me to add/change flags
Best regards
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:45:30 -0500
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] jaguar is up
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jaguar is a new animal meant to test
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:53:10 -0500
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Rick Gigger [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] should I worry?
Heikki
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:07:23 +
From: Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rick Gigger [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] should I worry?
Dear Tom,
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 10:05:58 -0500
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Rick Gigger [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re:
Hi Tom
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 19:47:04 -0500
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] should I worry?
I wrote:
Hmm, this is messier than I thought. What evidently has happened is
Dear Tom,
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 21:21:20 -0400
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] should I worry?
[EMAIL
Hi Tom et all!
Thanks for your mails.
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:08:24 -0400
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] should
Sorry to post on my own post,
I found this (as a little exemple I've got plenty of these)
could that be the culprit and how to correct that?
--
-- Name: RI_ConstraintTrigger_609094000; Type: TRIGGER; Schema: public; Owner:
delain
--
CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER unnamed
AFTER DELETE ON objets
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:42:24 -0400
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] should I worry?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi hackers,
I'm now testing 8.3beta2 on a relatively big (10G) database.
I've tried with pg_dymp -Fc/pg_restore and pg_dump/pgsql and get those
errors:
ERROR: trigger unnamed for relation objets already exists
ERROR: trigger unnamed for relation perso_objets already exists
ERROR: trigger
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:11:14 +
From: Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] should I worry?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm now testing
Hi Tom and Andrew,
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:04:34 -0400
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], PostgreSQL-development pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix
Hi all,
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:34:46 -0400
From: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: pgsql.hackers
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was
continuing to access the
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan
Hi Tom
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:04:34 -0400
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], PostgreSQL-development pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in
Hi Andrew
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:30:43 -0400
From: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Backend memory growing too much
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been using sqlgrey for some time now and I'm very surprised by the
memory taken by the backends to which sqlgrey is connected.
look at process 4111 and 28108 . They roughly take twice the space the
other backend take.
Could there be a memory leak?
I don't know much about
Hi Simon,
I'll be glad to test it for you when you're ready!
Thanks for looking at this issue.
Best regards,
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Simon Riggs wrote:
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:55:32 +0100
From: Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list
Hi Simon,
Sorry for replying so late...
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Simon Riggs wrote:
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 20:16:35 +0100
From: Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] little PITR annoyance
Hi Olivier,
On
Hi Simon,
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Simon Riggs wrote:
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 23:10:06 +0100
From: Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] little PITR annoyance
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:01 +0200, [EMAIL
Hi all,
I've benn biten twice by this one:
I enabled archiving on both my pgsql servers.
the archive command was a simple gzip on an nfs mounted dir.
Now the nfs server crashed.
Both wal space filled up until postgresql shuts itself down because of no
more space for WAL.
That perfectly normal and
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:50:56 -0500
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] misread release notes
ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
I read the fix incorrect
!
Regards
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 11:36:04 -0600 (CST)
From: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libxml on unixware
Tom Lane wrote:
ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
In order
Hi Tom,
It still pass with --enable-debug only,
So it seems an optimizer problem.
What's next?
Best regards
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 11:31:21 -0500
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
But wait...
it works fine as of HEAD today...
Sorry for the noise, will try to --enable-xml on warthog soon.
In the mean time,
Merry Xmas to all
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 14:05:21 +0100 (CET)
From: ohp@pyrenet.fr
To: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc
,
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Hi Albe,
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Albe Laurenz wrote:
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:31:35 +0100
From: Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
If libldap_r.so
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:20:44 -0500
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Albe,
Thanks for your remarks
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Albe Laurenz wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:54:13 +0100
From: Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] unixware
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The right way to do this I think is to put an entry adjusting LIBS in
src
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Albe Laurenz wrote:
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:42:50 +0100
From: Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
Olivier PRENANT wrote:
When I
]
To: Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unixware and --with-ldap
Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shouldn't that be
AC_CHECK_LIB(ldap_r, ldap_simple_bind, [],
[AC_MSG_ERROR([library
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your help,
I will try it ASAP and report maybe tonighgt CET.
Also, Makefile.port needs a little patch that I'll send to.
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:26:14 -0500
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ohp
-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery
Thanks for replying,
You are right but I have no knowedge on howto popagate this to
Makefile.unixware.
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:03:04 -0500
From: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers
PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Removing
#include $(top_srcdir)/contrib/contrib-global.mk
in sslinfo Makefile makes the problem go away...
Hope it helps
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:49:21 +0200
From: Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers
Hi Tom,
It now works like a charm!
Many thanks.
Best regards,
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:00:37 -0400
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Warthog failing
ohp
)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0
-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream, make
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:42:24 -0400
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pltcl -- solved
ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
Just a note that pltcl is now passing
1 entries from T_dta2
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
where to go from here.
If needed, I can open an account to someone who wants to try.
Regards,
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:03:39 -0400
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re
Hi Stefan,
Here's my make.log FWIW...
TIA
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 21:10:09 +0200
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: PostgreSQL-development pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] bison version
Yep!
I reverted to 1.875 and it works, I'll be a member of build farm soon for
UnixWare.
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 11:21:20 -0400
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED],
PostgreSQL-development
Hi,
I have finished buildfarm setup, just waiting for my credentials.
However, I've install tcl 8.5a and regression tests fail like this:
ISTM it's just cosmetic, just want to share...
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/home4/ohp/pgfarmbuild/HEAD/pgsql.24436/src/pl/plperl'
gmake[1]: Entering
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:03:39 -0400
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pl/tcl regression failed
ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
I have finished buildfarm setup, just
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream, make your
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 11:12:07 +0200
From: ohp@pyrenet.fr
To: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED], Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org
Newsgroups: pgsql.hackers
Subject: Re: Going for 'all green' buildfarm results
I can take other if that helps.
Ooops
(Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream, make your
My understanding is that null or not, their should have been a foreign key
violation.
Maybe I misunderstood.
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Stephan Szabo wrote:
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:48:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers
Many thanks for explaining.
I learned something today...
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Stephan Szabo wrote:
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:59:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] how
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Michael Fuhr wrote:
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:23:24 -0700
From: Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] where is the output
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 07:16:28PM +0100, ohp@pyrenet.fr
-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9
-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you
(Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream, make your
pg_dump is STILL emiting alter index.
ISTM we shou make it a warning AND remove it from pg_dump
Regards
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:54:12 -0400
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
ler@lerctr.org
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED],
'pgsql-hackers list' pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS
On Jul 26 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
FWIW, I just checked that CVS tip
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:26:20 -0400
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org
Cc: ohp@pyrenet.fr, 'pgsql-hackers list' pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS
Larry Rosenman ler
file so that I have a look?
BTW this is still on UnixWare 714
Regards,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:28:52 +0200 (MET DST)
From: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Newsgroups: pgsql.hackers
Subject: regressin failure on latest CVS
Hi,
I tried the latest cvs this morning
Hi Larry,
I'm quitge sure you'll see a problem if you remove --enable-debug
--enable-cassert from your ./configure
This is the problem I have.
Regards
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Date: 25 Jul 2005 09:00:41 -0500
From: Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Date: 25 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0500
From: Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS
On Jul 25 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
Hi Larry
@candle.pha.pa.us
Cc: Michael Glaesemann [EMAIL PROTECTED], pgsql-patches@postgresql.org,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, ohp@pyrenet.fr
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] regressin failure on latest CVS
This still does not fix the problem.
I had done my patch to try to mimic the way 8.0 had handled the math
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 11:36:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: Rocco Altier [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Michael Glaesemann [EMAIL PROTECTED], pgsql-patches@postgresql.org,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
==
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 11:36:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: Rocco Altier [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Michael Glaesemann [EMAIL PROTECTED], pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream
, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:40:33 -0500
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] problemsafter crash
ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
I had a crash last night and since while vacuuming databases
(Work)
6, Chemin d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream, make your dream
(Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
--
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
---(end
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
