Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Proposal for a cascaded master-slave replication system

2003-11-13 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 04:43:03PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > People often like to say they need hot-fail-capable, five BTW, this was not a rant at the person posting -- he was just reporting what he has heard. I've heard it plenty, too, and the people whence I've heard it are the rant targ

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Proposal for a cascaded master-slave replication system

2003-11-12 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:08:23PM +0100, Hans-J?rgen Sch?nig wrote: > an inferior product anyway. What I want to point out is that some people > want an alternative Oracle's Real Application Cluster. They want load > balancing and hot failover. Even data centers asking for replication did > no