Re: [HACKERS] "is_superuser" parameter creates inconsistencies

2003-10-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
OK, item remvoed. --- Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > Allow SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION to update the psql %n user display > > This already works. > > -- > Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: [HACKERS] "is_superuser" parameter creates inconsistencies

2003-10-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > Allow SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION to update the psql %n user display This already works. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister co

Re: [HACKERS] "is_superuser" parameter creates inconsistencies

2003-09-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
This item has been added to the 7.4 open items list: ftp://momjian.postgresql.org/pub/postgresql/open_items Allow SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION to update the psql %n user display --- Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Ei

Re: [HACKERS] "is_superuser" parameter creates inconsistencies

2003-08-31 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bruce Momjian writes: >> Is this a TODO item or something we want to address for 7.4? > I'd like to address it for 7.4, but it looks a bit more difficult than it > seemed at first, because session_user isn't in GUC at all, so there is no > infrastruct

Re: [HACKERS] "is_superuser" parameter creates inconsistencies

2003-08-31 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Presumably, the "is_superuser" parameter was intended to make the updating > > > of psql's prompt more accurate when SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION is used. > > > However, if the prompt is customized to inclu

Re: [HACKERS] "is_superuser" parameter creates inconsistencies

2003-08-31 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Presumably, the "is_superuser" parameter was intended to make the updating > > of psql's prompt more accurate when SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION is used. > > However, if the prompt is customized to include the user name (%n), then > > t

Re: [HACKERS] "is_superuser" parameter creates inconsistencies

2003-08-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Has this been addressed? --- Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Presumably, the "is_superuser" parameter was intended to make the updating > > of psql's prompt more accurate when SET SESSION A

Re: [HACKERS] "is_superuser" parameter creates inconsistencies

2003-07-28 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Presumably, the "is_superuser" parameter was intended to make the updating > of psql's prompt more accurate when SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION is used. > However, if the prompt is customized to include the user name (%n), then > the prompt changes to refle

[HACKERS] "is_superuser" parameter creates inconsistencies

2003-07-28 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Presumably, the "is_superuser" parameter was intended to make the updating of psql's prompt more accurate when SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION is used. However, if the prompt is customized to include the user name (%n), then the prompt changes to reflect the real superuser status, but does not change the