Pete Forman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I thought that Great Bridge's August benchmarks were rather skewed.
They only used one particular test from the AS3AP suite.
AFAIK there was nothing particularly sinister about that --- they
didn't have time to run a large number of different tests, so
Don Baccus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Great Bridge didn't do the benchmarking, they hired a third party to
do so. And that third party didn't, AFAIK, cherry-pick tests in order
to "prove" PG's superiority.
In fairness, the third party was Xperts Inc, who have long done a lot
of
Don Baccus writes:
I also hope that the PG crew, and Great Bridge, never stoop so low
as to ship benchmarks wired to "prove" PG's superiority.
I thought that Great Bridge's August benchmarks were rather skewed.
They only used one particular test from the AS3AP suite. That was the
basis for
At 10:19 AM 11/21/00 +, Pete Forman wrote:
Don Baccus writes:
I also hope that the PG crew, and Great Bridge, never stoop so low
as to ship benchmarks wired to "prove" PG's superiority.
I thought that Great Bridge's August benchmarks were rather skewed.
They only used one particular test
At 10:24 AM 11/13/00 -0800, Limin Liu wrote:
This's great. I have tested Postgres and MySQL with the benchmark shipped with mysql and (of course) MySQL out perform Postgres.
So how many simultaneous read/write processes does the MySQL benchmark fire up?
Why test a benchmark provided by
