Re: [HACKERS] [9.3 CF 1] 2 Weeks In & The problem with Performance Patches

2013-06-28 Thread Claudio Freire
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > (2) ideas on how we can speed up/parallelize performance testing efforts > are extremely welcome. An official perf-test script in GIT, even if it only tests general pg-bench-like performance, that can take two builds and compare them, like un

Re: [HACKERS] [9.3 CF 1] 2 Weeks In & The problem with Performance Patches

2013-06-28 Thread Andres Freund
On 2013-06-28 12:16:09 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > - Remove PD_ALL_VISIBLE** I think this is primarily delayed because people don't agree it's a good idea. > - Use posix_fallocate to build (new) WAL files** I don't think this needs much further testing. We should just remove the enable/disable k

[HACKERS] [9.3 CF 1] 2 Weeks In & The problem with Performance Patches

2013-06-28 Thread Josh Berkus
Folks, We are starting the 3rd week of the commitfest tommorrow, and here's the update on status. In the last week, we are at the following status levels: - 40 patches still Need Review, including 11 which have no reviewer assigned. - 23 patches are Waiting on Author, most of them be