Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On that, note that I specifically removed jdbc and tcl options from the
spec file because the 8.0.0 release notes said they were removed from
the distribution. I suppose at lease jdbc should be put back? It didn't
seem right to include the
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 08:27:58PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hopefully the third try is a charm ;-)
Version 3 is now available: fixes the init script. Previously
/etc/init.d/postgresql worked the first time used (i.e. would initdb and
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Why isn't the
.spec file (and the debian directory, for that matter) part of the
source tree?
Since packaging usually happens after a release, or at least continues
well after a release, such files or directories would be perpetually
outdated.
--
Peter Eisentraut
Joe Conway wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hopefully the third try is a charm ;-)
Version 3 is now available: fixes the init script. Previously
/etc/init.d/postgresql worked the first time used (i.e. would initdb
and start postgres) but not the second and subsequent
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Isn't there a way to generate this automatically? Why isn't the .spec
file (and the debian directory, for that matter) part of the source
tree?
Can't speak for Debian, but Red Hat at least would not use such a spec
file anyway. RH's procedures involve
Gaetano Mendola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW I have bitten recently on the attempt of change the default port.
I did it as usual changing it in postgresql.conf but that parameter
is overriden by:
PGPORT=5432
present on the start up script.
There is any reason to still pass this
Tom Lane wrote:
Gaetano Mendola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW I have bitten recently on the attempt of change the default port.
I did it as usual changing it in postgresql.conf but that parameter
is overriden by:
PGPORT=5432
present on the start up script.
There is any reason to still
Tom Lane wrote:
In the PG case a
single specfile currently aggregates the core server, jdbc, and
pygresql ... and I'm getting pressure to include more stuff.
How does that compute, considering that everyone else appears to be
working on including less stuff?
The init script is a different
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
In the PG case a
single specfile currently aggregates the core server, jdbc, and
pygresql ... and I'm getting pressure to include more stuff.
How does that compute, considering that everyone else appears to be
working on including
Tom Lane wrote:
Well, *Marc* is working on including less stuff; the rest of us don't
necessarily agree. In particular I've got to re-incorporate any major
pieces that get removed from the core distribution, since people expect
to find those in the RPM set. (In principle I suppose they could be
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On that, note that I specifically removed jdbc and tcl options from the
spec file because the 8.0.0 release notes said they were removed from
the distribution. I suppose at lease jdbc should be put back? It didn't
seem right to include the 7.4 jdbc jars
Joe Conway wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Well, *Marc* is working on including less stuff; the rest of us don't
necessarily agree. In particular I've got to re-incorporate any major
pieces that get removed from the core distribution, since people expect
to find those in the RPM set. (In principle I
Joe Conway wrote:
Version 2 of the source rpm is now available here:
http://www.joeconway.com/postgresql-8.0.0beta1/SRPM/postgresql-8.0.0beta1-2PGDG.src.rpm
I've also put up i386 binary rpms for fc1 and fc2, and x86_64 binary
rpms for fc2.
Hopefully the third try is a charm ;-)
Version 3 is now
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hopefully the third try is a charm ;-)
Version 3 is now available: fixes the init script. Previously
/etc/init.d/postgresql worked the first time used (i.e. would initdb and
start postgres) but not the second and subsequent times.
[ blink... ] Was this
Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hopefully the third try is a charm ;-)
Version 3 is now available: fixes the init script. Previously
/etc/init.d/postgresql worked the first time used (i.e. would initdb and
start postgres) but not the second and subsequent times.
[ blink...
Joe Conway wrote:
Steve Bergman wrote:
Anyone have an SRPM of spec file for the beta?
I just created and posted a source RPM for 8.0.0beta1. As I'm not the
usual packager, and a pure hack when it comes to building my own RPMs,
it would be a Good Thing(tm) if someone else could vet this package;
Steve Bergman wrote:
Anyone have an SRPM of spec file for the beta?
(moved to HACKERS)
I just created and posted a source RPM for 8.0.0beta1. As I'm not the
usual packager, and a pure hack when it comes to building my own RPMs,
it would be a Good Thing(tm) if someone else could vet this package;
17 matches
Mail list logo
