On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 07:50:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
It's entirely likely that ecpg's derivative of the backend's datetime
modules contains lots and lots of memory leaks, since AFAIK the palloc
infrastructure is not there in the ecpg environment :-(.
I wonder why is this? Is there some
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 05:13:23PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 07:50:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
It's entirely likely that ecpg's derivative of the backend's datetime
modules contains lots and lots of memory leaks, since AFAIK the palloc
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 05:13:23PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 07:50:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
It's entirely likely that ecpg's derivative of the backend's datetime
modules contains lots and lots of memory leaks, since AFAIK
