Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Get rid of USE_WIDE_UPPER_LOWER dependency in trigram constructi

2013-04-08 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Tom Lane writes: > How exactly would you know whether the previous installation was built > without HAVE_WCSTOMBS/HAVE_TOWLOWER? That's not exposed anywhere > reliable. And it's not out of the question that somebody upgrading to > a newer PG version might upgrade his OS too, so I would not think

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Get rid of USE_WIDE_UPPER_LOWER dependency in trigram constructi

2013-04-08 Thread Tom Lane
Dimitri Fontaine writes: > Tom Lane writes: >> If there is anybody still using Postgres on machines without wcstombs() or >> towlower(), and they have non-ASCII data indexed by pg_trgm, they'll need >> to REINDEX those indexes after pg_upgrade to 9.3, else searches may fail >> incorrectly. It see