On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> >
> > Hmm. Now that I think about it, it is probably possible to have a
> > transaction started before CIC that inserted a bunch of rows, and then
> > runs the UPDATE during the CIC race window. Maybe there's a re
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera writes:
>
> > > May I suggest
> >
> > > + If CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY was used to build an index
> > > + that depends on a column not previously indexed, then rows
> > > + updated by transactions that ran concurrently wit
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > May I suggest
>
> > + If CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY was used to build an index
> > + that depends on a column not previously indexed, then rows
> > + updated by transactions that ran concurrently with
> > + the CREATE INDEX command
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> (I fear this is too late for the current set of releases; I don't want
>> to make the packagers redo their work just for this. But we can correct
>> it for future wraps.)
> I think a large fraction of the readers will grab the release notes from
> the
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Release note updates.
> Sorry for not noticing earlier, but there is a bug in the notes:
Mmm, right.
> May I suggest
> + If CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY was used to build an index
> + that depends on a column not previously indexed, then rows
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Release note updates.
> >
> > Add item for last-minute CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY fix.
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for not noticing earlier, but there is a bug in the notes:
>
> + If CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY was used to build
Tom Lane wrote:
> Release note updates.
>
> Add item for last-minute CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY fix.
Hi,
Sorry for not noticing earlier, but there is a bug in the notes:
+ If CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY was used to build an index
+ that depends on a column not previously indexed, then ro
