On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 12:48:55PM -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
> > This looks like you're using an old version of the parser. preproc.y was
> > changed to handle empty database names and the the error you report is
> > due to an empty db name.
>
> I think the problem is that the latest version of p
Chris Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) writes:
>> No, because those derived files are not in CVS at all. What you
>> are describing sounds to me like a clock skew problem. Is your
>> machine's system clock showing the correct date?
> Odd, odd. NOT a clock proble
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) writes:
> Chris Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If I touch preproc.y and pgc.l, the .c files get regenerated, and all
>> is well.
>
>> If I don't, they get left alone, and I see compilation errors.
>
>> It seems to me you need to rebuild the C files and commit the
Chris Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I touch preproc.y and pgc.l, the .c files get regenerated, and all
> is well.
> If I don't, they get left alone, and I see compilation errors.
> It seems to me you need to rebuild the C files and commit them.
No, because those derived files are not i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Meskes) writes:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 03:35:14PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> >Ah. So this would have caused a bunch of problems in compiling
>> >src/interfaces/ecpg/test/connect/test1.pgc???
>
> Not the compilation errors I would think.
>
>> i'm seeing this error
On 8/30/06, Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 03:35:14PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> i'm seeing this error when compiling HEAD (updated at ago 29 15:16)
> ...
This looks like you're using an old version of the parser. preproc.y was
changed to handle empty datab
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 03:35:14PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> >Ah. So this would have caused a bunch of problems in compiling
> >src/interfaces/ecpg/test/connect/test1.pgc???
Not the compilation errors I would think.
> i'm seeing this error when compiling HEAD (updated at ago 29 15:16)
> ...
On 8/29/06, Chris Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Meskes) writes:
>> Second try committing the path changes.
>
> Ah, this looks better. I get clean passes on both HPPA in-tree and
> Fedora x86_64 VPATH builds, so I think you've
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Meskes) writes:
>> Second try committing the path changes.
>
> Ah, this looks better. I get clean passes on both HPPA in-tree and
> Fedora x86_64 VPATH builds, so I think you've finally fixed all the
> issues. Congrats!
Ah. So th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Meskes) writes:
> Second try committing the path changes.
Ah, this looks better. I get clean passes on both HPPA in-tree and
Fedora x86_64 VPATH builds, so I think you've finally fixed all the
issues. Congrats!
regards, tom lane
--
10 matches
Mail list logo