Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom, do we really want to add a GUC that is used just for comparison of
> > performance? I know we have the seqscan on/off, but there are valid
> > reasons to do that. Do you think there will be cases where it will
> > faster to have
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom, do we really want to add a GUC that is used just for comparison of
> performance? I know we have the seqscan on/off, but there are valid
> reasons to do that. Do you think there will be cases where it will
> faster to have this hash setting off?
S
Tom Lane wrote:
> Log message:
> Finish implementation of hashed aggregation. Add enable_hashagg GUC
> parameter to allow it to be forced off for comparison purposes.
> Add ORDER BY clauses to a bunch of regression test queries that will
> otherwise produce randomly-ordered
