Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/contrib/fulltextindex README.fti

2002-09-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Well WARNING is kinda standard - I have seen the like in other projects. > Well, at least this way they'll read it and then hopefully port over to > tsearch or at least they can make an informed decision to stick with > fulltextindex. It is pretty crummy tho - the

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/contrib/fulltextindex README.fti

2002-09-01 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
gt; To: Christopher Kings-Lynne > Cc: Hackers > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/contrib/fulltextindex > README.fti > > > > WARNING does seem like a strong word, though I can't come up with a word &g

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/contrib/fulltextindex README.fti

2002-09-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
WARNING does seem like a strong word, though I can't come up with a word that would make sure they read it, maybe SUGGESTION? --- Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Thanks - what do people think of the WARNING file? Please h

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/contrib/fulltextindex README.fti ...

2002-09-01 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Thanks - what do people think of the WARNING file? Please have a read and comment perhaps? Chris > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian > - CVS > Sent: Monday, 2 September 2002 2:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [COM