Re: [HACKERS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] SLL error 100% cpu]

2008-03-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
Added to TODO: o Prevent SSL from sending network packets to avoid interference with Win32 signal emulation http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-12/msg00455.php --- Magnus Hagander

Re: [HACKERS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] SLL error 100% cpu]

2007-12-12 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 12:30:50AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > "Trevor Talbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On 12/11/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I dunno anything about how to fix the real problem (what's winsock error > >> 10004?), > > > WSAEINTR, "A blocking operation was interru

Re: [HACKERS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] SLL error 100% cpu]

2007-12-11 Thread Tom Lane
"Trevor Talbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 12/11/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I dunno anything about how to fix the real problem (what's winsock error >> 10004?), > WSAEINTR, "A blocking operation was interrupted by a call to > WSACancelBlockingCall." Oh, then it's exactly the

Re: [HACKERS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] SLL error 100% cpu]

2007-12-11 Thread Trevor Talbot
On 12/11/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I dunno anything about how to fix the real problem (what's winsock error > 10004?), but I don't think he'd be seeing full speed log filling in > 8.2.5. WSAEINTR, "A blocking operation was interrupted b

Re: [HACKERS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] SLL error 100% cpu]

2007-12-11 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This guy is using 8.2.5. SSL seems to be able to fill his log files at > full speed. Are you *sure* the server is 8.2.5? 8.2.5 shouldn't emit duplicate messages, but 8.2.4 and before would: 2007-05-17 21:20 tgl * src/backend/libpq/: be-secu

[HACKERS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] SLL error 100% cpu]

2007-12-11 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Hi, Here's another problem report on Windows. This time it is usage of SSL connections and NOTIFY. I talked to Magnus on IRC and he directed me to bug #2829: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-12/msg00122.php This report seems to be a little different, if only because the reported e