On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Given the lack of previous complaints, I'm not sure this amounts to
> >> a back-patchable bug, but it does seem like something worth fixing
> >> going forward.
>
> >
Robert Haas writes:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Given the lack of previous complaints, I'm not sure this amounts to
>> a back-patchable bug, but it does seem like something worth fixing
>> going forward.
> Agreed, although I'd be willing to see us slip it into 9.4. It'
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Given the lack of previous complaints, I'm not sure this amounts to
> a back-patchable bug, but it does seem like something worth fixing
> going forward.
Agreed, although I'd be willing to see us slip it into 9.4. It's
doubtful that anyone will
Brian Dunavant writes:
> I am using a partial functional index on a table where F(a) = a. Querying
> whre F(a) = a hits the index as expected. However the reverse statement a
> = F(a) does not. I have verified this in 9.3.4.
> Is this a deficiency with the query planner, or are these not actual
