Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] thread_test.c problems

2004-04-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > My plan is to have 'configure' run this program as part of its > > operation, > > Peter's not going to be happy with you ;-) Runtime configure tests are > not part of the Grand Plan --- ideally configure should only have to do > comp

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] thread_test.c problems

2004-04-06 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My plan is to have 'configure' run this program as part of its > operation, Peter's not going to be happy with you ;-) Runtime configure tests are not part of the Grand Plan --- ideally configure should only have to do compile and link tests.

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] thread_test.c problems

2004-04-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 4/5/04 8:31 AM, "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> OK, new patch applied that causes all threads to wait until the parent > >>> checks their thread-specific pointers. I ran 1000 tests and all passed. > >>> Hopefully it will good for you too. > >> > >>