Re: [HACKERS] [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures?

2005-02-28 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, Francisco, Francisco Figueiredo Jr. schrieb: In fact, I think people keep requesting me support on Npgsql for that because MS Sql server supports it and they are porting their code to use Postgresql and facing that difficult. Indeed, for (a) we could use an approach similar to Ms sql

Re: [HACKERS] [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures?

2005-02-28 Thread Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Markus Schaber wrote: | Hi, Francisco, | | Francisco Figueiredo Jr. schrieb: | | |In fact, I think people keep requesting me support on Npgsql for that |because MS Sql server supports it and they are porting their code to use |Postgresql and facing

Re: [HACKERS] [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures?

2005-02-25 Thread Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom Lane wrote: | Francisco Figueiredo Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | |Could I add another item? | | |Could we have the row count of statements executed inside a |procedure/function returned to client? | | | IMHO that request is completely bogus; if

Re: [HACKERS] [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures?

2005-02-24 Thread Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
--- Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Gavin and Neil made some noise in late September about implementing stored procedures for PG 8.1, but I haven't heard anything more about it since that thread died off. I've been getting some pressure inside Red Hat to see us support more of the JDBC

Re: [HACKERS] [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures?

2005-02-24 Thread Tom Lane
Francisco Figueiredo Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Could I add another item? Could we have the row count of statements executed inside a procedure/function returned to client? IMHO that request is completely bogus; if the procedure wants to tell the client that, it's the procedure's