On 5/21/09 6:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
The patch adds the AS keyword to the plpgsql grammar and doesn't
assign an expression parameter to the sql construct if the scalar
follows the AS keyword.
Would it be possible to also support = as well as as? I believe
that SQL
Josh Berkus wrote:
On 5/21/09 6:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
The patch adds the AS keyword to the plpgsql grammar and doesn't
assign an expression parameter to the sql construct if the scalar
follows the AS keyword.
Would it be possible to also support = as well as as? I
Hello
2009/5/21 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Steve Prentice prent...@cisco.com writes:
This patch is intended to supplement Pavel's patch for named and mixed
notation support in 8.5. This patch makes it so a plpgsql function can
call another function with the same parameter names using the
Hello,
This patch is intended to supplement Pavel's patch for named and mixed
notation support in 8.5. This patch makes it so a plpgsql function can
call another function with the same parameter names using the named
parameters notation. Without this patch, the following example will
Steve Prentice prent...@cisco.com writes:
This patch is intended to supplement Pavel's patch for named and mixed
notation support in 8.5. This patch makes it so a plpgsql function can
call another function with the same parameter names using the named
parameters notation.
Well,
The patch adds the AS keyword to the plpgsql grammar and doesn't
assign an expression parameter to the sql construct if the scalar
follows the AS keyword.
Would it be possible to also support = as well as as? I believe
that SQL Server uses = exclusively, and supporting that syntax would
2009/5/21 Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com:
The patch adds the AS keyword to the plpgsql grammar and doesn't
assign an expression parameter to the sql construct if the scalar
follows the AS keyword.
Would it be possible to also support = as well as as? I believe that
SQL Server uses =
2009/5/21 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com:
2009/5/21 Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com:
The patch adds the AS keyword to the plpgsql grammar and doesn't
assign an expression parameter to the sql construct if the scalar
follows the AS keyword.
Would it be possible to also support = as well
= is more common than as for sure, but this has been talked about
before starting at about this message:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/14319.1228833...@sss.pgh.pa.us
-Steve
On May 21, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
The patch adds the AS keyword to the plpgsql grammar
Josh Berkus wrote:
The patch adds the AS keyword to the plpgsql grammar and doesn't
assign an expression parameter to the sql construct if the scalar
follows the AS keyword.
Would it be possible to also support = as well as as? I believe
that SQL Server uses = exclusively, and supporting
10 matches
Mail list logo