David Rowley dgrowle...@gmail.com writes:
I'm reasonably happy with the patch now, the only small niggles are maybe
the Assert() is probably not so much needed as transformLimitClause() seems
to coerce to int8 anyway, and recompute_limits() does not bother with the
Assert() when it does the
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:37 PM, David Rowley dgrowle...@gmail.com wrote:
I've had a bit of a look at this and here's a couple of things:
Thanks. Sorry I didn't back to you earlier, I almost forgot about the review.
/*
+* LIMIT clause can be removed if it's a positive constant
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Marti Raudsepp ma...@juffo.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:37 PM, David Rowley dgrowle...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've had a bit of a look at this and here's a couple of things:
Thanks. Sorry I didn't back to you earlier, I almost forgot about the
review.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Marti Raudsepp ma...@juffo.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 1:22 PM, David Rowley dgrowle...@gmail.com
wrote:
the argument for this would
have been much stronger if anti join support had just been added last
week.
It's been quite a few years now and
Hi
Thanks for taking a look.
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 1:22 PM, David Rowley dgrowle...@gmail.com wrote:
the argument for this would
have been much stronger if anti join support had just been added last week.
It's been quite a few years now and the argument for this must be getting
weaker with
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Marti Raudsepp ma...@juffo.org wrote:
Hi list,
Attached patch allows semijoin/antijoin/hashed SubPlan optimization
when an EXISTS subquery contains a LIMIT clause with a positive
constant. It seems to be a fairly common meme to put LIMIT 1 into
EXISTS()
