Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Win32 errno a little bit safer

2001-09-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Thanks. Patch applied. > Hello, i just reviewed the win32 errno patch and i saw that maybe i didn't > really played it totally safe in my last suggestion, the system table might > pick up the msg but not the netmsg.dll, so better try both. > I also added a hex printout of the "errno" appended t

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Win32 errno a little bit safer

2001-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. > Hello, i just reviewed the win32 errno patch and i saw that maybe i didn't > really played it totally safe in my last sugg

[HACKERS] [PATCH] Win32 errno a little bit safer

2001-08-23 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
Hello, i just reviewed the win32 errno patch and i saw that maybe i didn't really played it totally safe in my last suggestion, the system table might pick up the msg but not the netmsg.dll, so better try both. I also added a hex printout of the "errno" appended to all messages, that's nicer. If