Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] empty xml values

2014-09-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 8/30/14 12:43 PM, Ali Akbar wrote: > While looking into this report > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cf48ccfb.65a9d%tim.k...@gmail.com I > noticed that we don't accept empty values as xml "content" values, even > though this should apparently be allowed by the spec. Attach

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] empty xml values

2014-08-30 Thread Ali Akbar
> > While looking into this report > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cf48ccfb.65a9d%tim.k...@gmail.com I > noticed that we don't accept empty values as xml "content" values, even > though this should apparently be allowed by the spec. Attached is a > patch to fix it (which needs updates to xm

[HACKERS] [PATCH] empty xml values

2014-05-11 Thread Peter Eisentraut
While looking into this report http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cf48ccfb.65a9d%tim.k...@gmail.com I noticed that we don't accept empty values as xml "content" values, even though this should apparently be allowed by the spec. Attached is a patch to fix it (which needs updates to xml_1.out, whi